16:51 GMT +323 October 2019
Listen Live
    Largest intercontinental ballistic missile Titan 2

    You Can't Win Them All: This Time US May Lose New Arms Race

    © Flickr/ Devin Ford
    Politics
    Get short URL
    12948
    Subscribe

    The United States may lose a new arms race in today's multi-polar world, prominent US writer and publicist David A. Andelman says, stating that Washington is currently facing new multinational, multidimensional threats.

    According to prominent American writer and publicist David A. Andelman, Washington is facing a new arms race, potentially far more threatening than during the Cold War.

    "All that is history. But not the arms race. It's still going on, though in a vastly different, expanded and far more expensive format that's potentially even more threatening. And this time we may be losing," the writer stressed.

    Mr. Andelman pointed out that this year Moscow demonstrated "three new, utterly modern armored vehicles" during its May 9 Victory Day parade. Russia is seeking to replenish its military arsenal that now includes new MIG-35 multirole fighters, advanced Pantsir mobile artillery weapon systems, Bora-class guided missile hovercrafts and stealth submarines.

    "In all, we are looking at a potent 845,000 troops, 22,550 tanks, and 1,399 combat aircraft, with 70% of Russian equipment defined as "modern" in the next five years," the publicist underscored.

    Meanwhile, China is modernizing its People's Liberation Army at a steady pace. China's defense expenditures now amount "for more than a third" of all military spending in Asia. Furthermore, Beijing has already launched its first aircraft carrier Liaoning, a renovated 302-meter former Soviet vessel, and is currently building a second one, which is expected to be far more advanced.

    According to the writer, China's military spending last year amounted to $216 billion, while Russia had spent only $84.5 billion. In contrast, the United States annually pours more than $600 billion in its military sector.

    However, Mr. Andelman remarked that "such numbers don't tell the full story."

    "Today's new arms race is not just with Russia, but an integral part of today's multipolar world. And certainly it's more expensive, in part because of the multinational, multidimensional threats…  At the same time, we must not be distracted from our greatest, potentially existential, threats: terrorism and its special warfare requirements, and the cyber arms race," he stressed, insisting that China and Russia are matching the US here "step for step."

    The author believes that Washington should spend more if it wants to come out on top, slamming the Senate for voting down an essential appropriations bill, after it approved a $600 billion defense budget.

    At the same time Mr. Andelman pointed to the Pentagon's decision to supply heavy offensive weapons to the Baltic states and Poland, "all NATO members directly on Russia's frontiers."

    "None of this should suggest that any armed conflict is imminent. But it's quite clear that on multiple fronts this time, we're in a new arms race, with no clear winner," he highlighted.

    Related:

    Re-Nuclearization of Europe: The Unthinkable May Turn Into Reality
    US Nuclear Weapons Talk: 'A Great Deal of Concern' for Europe
    US Defense Secretary to Allies: Throw Out the Cold War Playbook
    World Scratches Head: ‘We Don’t Understand America’s Need for Guns’
    Tags:
    NATO, arms race, military spending, multipolar world, terrorism, cyber warfare, Pantsir missile system, MiG-35, US Senate, Moscow, Washington, Russia, China, United States, Pentagon
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik