Listen Live
    German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg, U.S. President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Theresa May, front row from left, watch a fly-by during a summit of heads of state and government at NATO headquarters in Brussels Wednesday, July 11, 2018. NATO leaders gather in Brussels for a two-day summit to discuss Russia, Iraq and their mission in Afghanistan.

    NATO Has Been Preparing For Collapse of INF Treaty for Months – Report

    © AP Photo / Markus Schreiber
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL
    5114
    Subscribe

    The US threatened to initiate the withdrawal process from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty on 2 February, citing a lack of "Russian compliance". Washington claims that Russian 9M729 missiles violate the treaty, demanding that they be destroyed. Moscow has denied the claims, and has presented the missile's characteristics.

    NATO officials have been preparing for the collapse of the INF Treaty for months, although the US hasn't officially begun the withdrawal process from the accord, Bloomberg reported, citing an anonymous White House official. The same source added that Washington will suspend its obligations under the treaty starting 2 February unless Russia destroys the missiles and launchers, which allegedly violate the treaty, but didn't specify whether it would also be announcing its full withdrawal.

    US Undersecretary for Arms Control and International Security Andrea Thompson announced on 16 January 2019 that the US would start the process of withdrawing from the bilateral treaty on 2 February and that it would take 6 months to complete. She added that Russia can still prove that it has ceased its alleged violations of the treaty during this time period.

    Washington has mulled pulling out of the INF Treaty since October 2018, with US National Security Adviser John Bolton calling the INF Treaty "outdated". The US has accused Moscow of violating the accord by developing 9M729 (NATO reporting name SSC-8) missiles and testing them at a range banned by the agreement, which prohibits missiles with ranges between 500km and 5,500km.

    READ MORE: Russia Accuses US of Creating Medium and Short-Range Missiles, INF Fate in Limbo

    Russia has repeatedly denied the accusations, arguing that the 9M729 missile does not violate the accord. While being repeatedly accused of a "lack of transparency" in the matter by the US and European allies, Moscow held a briefing to present the missile and clarify its characteristics.

    The 9M729 has a maximum range of 480km, which is 10km shorter than its predecessor, meaning that it is in line with the INF Treaty.  The reduction in range was prompted by an upgrade of its warhead and guidance system, with the missile's engine, fuel tank, and booster remaining unchanged.

    Representatives of the US, UK, France, Germany, the EU and NATO did not attend the Russian Defence Ministry's briefing on the missile.

    READ MORE: Germany Interested in Russia's Proposals on Preserving INF Treaty

    The INF Treaty was signed by the Soviet Union and the US in 1987, and provides for the elimination of all nuclear-armed ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles, along with their launchers, that operate at ranges of between 500-1,000 kilometres (short-range) and 1,000-5,500 km (intermediate-range).

    Related:

    Russia to Express Concern Over US Arms Violating INF Treaty During Friday Talks
    'INF Treaty Still Has a Chance' - German Foreign Minister
    INF Treaty US Abrogation: Chance of New Arms Race is Very Likely - Scholar
    Russian MoD Shows Iskander-M Launchers With 9M729 Rockets Amid INF Row With US
    EU Diplomats Leaving Russian Official INF Briefing Refuse to Comment on It
    Russia Accuses US of Creating Medium and Short-Range Missiles, INF Fate in Limbo
    Tags:
    treaty, arms race, INF Treaty, NATO, United States, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik