"Atomic Energy? No, thank you!" That's what many thought looking at the accidents at nuclear power plants in Chernobyl or Fukushima, and also taking into account the difficulties associated with the half-life of radioactive waste that is thousands of years.
But what would happen if the core of the reactor couldn't melt, and the terrible consequences of this could be excluded? If the reactor wouldn't produce hazardous long-lasting fission products? The answer may be the so-called "dual-fluid reactor" (DFR), designed by the Berlin Institute of Solid State Physics. At least this is precisely what the developers in Berlin are aiming for.
"Our reactor core cannot melt because the fuel is already melted", nuclear physicist — Goetz Ruprecht — who participated in the development of a dual-fluid reactor said. According to him, radioactive salts or liquefied radioactive metals will be used as fuel.
How it works: two liquid cycles meet in the core
Unlike well-known molten salt reactors, it employs two separate liquid cycles in the reactor's core. In one of them, radioactive fuel circulates, in the other — molten lead, which takes on the heat of the fuel and transports it from the core.
For particularly efficient heat transfer, both fluids move parallel to each other in about 10,000 pipes. Lead transfers further heat the next cycle of hydrogen or carbon, and the latter eventually triggers a turbine that produces electricity.
Also shown in the graph: another cycle (loop) in which short-lived elements circulate and act as a kind of lead preheater. This already gives an indication that this new type of reactor is created with the aim of eliminating waste disposal.
"Long-lived waste occurs due to incomplete combustion", Ruprecht explained. "This is a relic from the times of military use, when, unfortunately, decisions were made in favour of solid nuclear fuel. The reasons for this were strategic because the first pressurised water reactors were used in submarines. The fuel elements, which were used on submarines, were produced ashore".
In the reactor, figuratively speaking, the heat of wood, turned into coal, would be used, while the coal would be thrown away. "Only 5% of the fuel from the fuel elements is used, and the rest of the material, which can be successfully converted into fission products, but not in a reactor of this type, is not just being disposed of, but must be specially stored".
Nearly 100% of nuclear waste can be burned
The circulation principle solves this problem. During each round, the mixture is prepared, cleaned, and freed from decomposition products then the materials that are not burned are sent to a new cycle. The principle, which uses the separation of two cycles, is comparable to the operation of a filtration plant.
"As a result of long-term use, the material is almost 100% burned", the nuclear scientist said.
"Only fission products remain, the radioactivity of which falls below that of natural uranium and occurs after 300 years", Ruprecht explained.
In case of an emergency liquid fuel streams into storage tanks
If a reactor overheats, there is a very simple solution: overheated salt will dissolve melt plugs and liquid fuel will stream into storage tanks where it will cool down to a safe temperature. It can be re-uploaded to for new cycle if necessary. The pipes themselves must be made of the most corrosion-resistant material in order to process toxic acids. Ideally, these pipes should last for up to 60 years, in the worst case they should be replaced every 20 years.
Given the small size of the reactor (about three metres in diameter), this will not lead to excessive consumption of materials. The reactor core itself is quite expensive to produce, but it eliminates the need for refurbishment, intricate safety equipment and waste disposal, which should save a lot of money after its construction.
Moreover, after the separation of fission products, precious metals, as well as radioactive isotopes that may be used for nuclear medicine, can be recovered. For example, a DFR is expected to produce 300 grams of molybdenum-99 annually, which would exceed the global demand by four times.
Nuclear power is the most efficient renewable energy
According to Ruprecht, people won't be able to escape the use of nuclear energy.
"My colleagues and I don't see an alternative to it", he stressed. "Because only renewable energy alone won't be able to improve the climate situation. This is a physical fact, it is impossible to build power plants that can bear a really heavy load relying on that".
Natural resources, according to the expert, will be exhausted sooner or later, and only nuclear carriers will remain. "There are enough resources for this. You can dig deeper to extract uranium from the ground or extract it from seawater". Thus, it will be possible to cover the needs of humanity for millions of years.
"You probably know what renewable energy is. This energy is derived from resources, which will last for a long time even after the existence of mankind. These resources include, in particular, atomic energy. We consider it renewable", Ruprecht explained.
The vews and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.
The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.