02:07 GMT +318 July 2019
Listen Live
    US Navy Railgun

    ‘Case Study’ In How Not to Innovate: US Admiral on Electromagnetic Rail Gun

    © YouTube/USNavyResearch
    US
    Get short URL
    8331

    The US Navy’s chief of naval operations says the fledgling electromagnetic railgun designed for surface ships is a “case study” in how not to develop a weapons system.

    "I would say that railgun is kind of the case study that would say, ‘This is how innovation maybe shouldn't happen,'" US Adm. John M. Richardson said at the Atlantic Council on Wednesday in Washington.

    The US Navy has spent at least $500 million developing the weapon, which would shoot projectiles farther and faster using electromagnetic currents instead of chemical explosives. One of the ideas behind the weapon is that it could shoot projectiles at hypersonic speeds such that the projectile's kinetic impact alone would render explosives-based railgun projectiles redundant.

    "It's been around, I think, for about 15 years, maybe 20. So, ‘rapid' doesn't come to mind when you're talking about timeframes like that," the admiral said at the Council's Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security.

    More time and more money won't suffice to fix the railgun's engineering problems, since the project has had plenty of both and yet still faces challenges. "The engineering of building something like that, that can handle that much electromagnetic energy and not just explode, is challenging," said Richardson.

    Sputnik News warned in May of 2017 that the "game changer" weapon system was on the verge of being permanently shelved as the Pentagon's Strategic Capabilities Office sought to starve the railgun of funds. "People at SCO don't want to fund the railgun because they're simply not buying it," a Capitol Hill staffer said at the time.

    The head of naval operations is holding out hope for a turnaround anyway. "So, we're going to continue after this, right? We're going to install this thing. We're going to continue to develop it, test it… it's too great a weapon system, so it's going somewhere, hopefully."

    Particle debris ignites as a test slug exits the Office of Naval Research (ONR) 32 MJ (megajoules) Electromagnetic Railgun (EMRG) laboratory launcher located at the Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division (NSWCDD)
    © AFP 2019 / John F. Williams / Office of Naval Research

    Meanwhile, images of a railgun mounted onto the bow of a Chinese Type 072II-class landing ship last month prompted informed speculation the ship was heading out for sea trials, Sputnik reported.

    The railgun was once intended for the US Navy's Zumwalt-class stealth warship program, but that program has been a virtual failure, according to watchdogs. "If the US war in Afghanistan were a ship, it would be a Navy Zumwalt-class destroyer," the Project on Government Oversight says of the US Navy's ‘Titanium Tin Cans.' Alas, "inside a Pentagon spending nearly $2 billion a day, it's easy to lose sight of truly wasteful programs," POGO noted in a report last month.

    Related:

    Enthusiastic US Engineer Test-Fires Homemade Railgun (VIDEO)
    Russia Developing Own Railgun on Par With US 'Battlefield Meteorite'
    Blitzer Railgun Successfully Tested for US Army at Land War Exercise
    China’s Electromagnetic Railgun Ship Appears to Start Sea Trials (PHOTOS)
    Turkey Announces Successful Test of ‘Sapan’ Railgun Hypervelocity Weapon
    Tags:
    electromagnetic railguns (EMRG), Atlantic Council, US Navy, John Richardson, Washington
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik