22:09 GMT +314 December 2019
Listen Live
    Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump takes the stage for a campaign event at Fredericksburg Expo Center August 20, 2016 in Fredericksburg, Virginia

    Trump Slams 'Boring' Report on Israeli-Linked Firm Allegedly Helping Him Win

    © AFP 2019 / MOLLY RILEY
    US
    Get short URL
    13263
    Subscribe

    Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into alleged foreign meddling in the 2016 US election took an unexpected turn as it is now looking into “social media manipulation” by an Israeli-linked company, The New York Times reported.

    Reacting to the report, President Donald Trump took to Twitter to blast “a long & boring story,” The New York Times had done, highlighting that the “most expensive Witch Hunt” had found no collusion between the Kremlin and his campaign, and now it’s turned to the rest of the world.

    According to the report, the special counsel’s team is investigating contacts between Joel Zamel, an Israeli social media expert, and George Nader, a special adviser to leaders of the UAE, who purportedly offered to help Donald Trump win the race.

    READ MORE: 'Total Witch Hunt!' Trump Reacts to Declassified House Intel Report

    The New York Times suggested that the third person, who served as a mediator, having arranged the meeting between the two, was Erik Prince, former head of the Blackwater private security contractor.

    The alleged meeting took place on August 3, 2016, three months ahead of the presidential election, with Nader telling Donald Trump Jr. that Saudi Arabia and the UAE were willing to help his father win the election, while Zamel exalted his firm’s ability to boost a political campaign.

    According to the NYT piece, by that time, the company had already worked out a multimillion-dollar proposal for a social media manipulation effort to increase Trump’s chances to win. At the same time, the media outlet stated that it is unclear if the proposal was eventually executed, but reported, citing a source with knowledge of the meeting, that Trump Jr. approved of the plan.

    The NYT claimed that Nader transferred a generous amount of money (allegedly as much as $2 million) to Zamel after Trump was elected.

    “There are conflicting accounts of the reason for the payment, but among other things, a company linked to Mr. Zamel provided Mr. Nader with an elaborate presentation about the significance of social media campaigning to Mr. Trump’s victory,” the report read.

    The report suggested that Zamel was questioned by Mueller’s investigators and at least two FBI agents were sent to Israel to interview the firm’s employees; the special counsel’s team also cooperated with the Israel Police to confiscate computers of one of Zamel’s companies. The media outlet also stated, citing sources familiar with the case that “investigators have questioned numerous witnesses in Washington, New York, Atlanta, Tel Aviv and elsewhere about what foreign help may have been pledged or accepted.”

    READ MORE: Giuliani: Mueller Told Trump Team President Won't Be Indicted

    Zamel’s attorney denied his client had participated in the Trump campaign:

    “Neither Joel Zamel, nor any of his related entities, had any involvement whatsoever in the U.S. election campaign. The D.O.J. clarified from Day 1 that Joel and his companies have never been a target of the investigation. My client provided full cooperation to the government to assist with their investigation,” said the lawyer, Marc L. Mukasey.

    Kathryn Ruemmler, a lawyer for Nader, also claimed that her client “has fully cooperated with the special counsel’s investigation and will continue to do so.”

    READ MORE: GOP House Intelligence Committee Members: 'No Collusion' Between Russia, Trump

    According to the NYT, Erik Prince refused to comment on the report, while the White House did not respond to a request for comment.

    Robert Mueller was originally tasked with investigating Russia’s alleged meddling in the 2016 US presidential elections amid claims that Moscow had colluded with President Donald Trump’s campaign team to influence the outcome of the vote. Russia has consistently denied any involvement, denouncing the accusation as “absurd,” while Trump has repeatedly dismissed the Mueller probe as a “witch hunt.”

    In late April, the US House of Representatives’ Intelligence Committee found no collusion between Trump and the Kremlin, which prompted many officials, including US Vice-President Mike Pence, to urge Mueller to “wrap up” his year-long probe.

    Related:

    Russian Meddling in Mexican Election Statements Groundless - President of Senate
    US Senate Intel Panel to Hold Hearing on Alleged Russian Election Meddling
    US Senate Intelligence Panel Plans to End Probe Into Russia Meddling in August
    US Senate Accuses Moscow of 2016 Alleged Election Meddling: Finds No Evidence
    Mueller Team Seeks to Delay First Hearing in Russia Meddling Case – Reports
    Tags:
    Russian collusion, alleged collusion, alleged Russian meddling, "Russian meddling", US elections, New York Times, Robert Mueller, Donald Trump, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik