09:29 GMT13 June 2021
Listen Live
    Military & Intelligence
    Get short URL

    While the advent of big guns rendered battleships obsolete decades ago, according to military experts, there have been reports that the arrival of a new canon in the US arsenal might facilitate their comeback.

    The US Army is developing a new cannon it claims will have a range of more than 1,000 miles, writes Popular Mechanics.
    The Strategic Long Range Cannon (SLRC) is touted as potentially being able to strike targets at up to 1,150 miles (1,850 km) away and fire 50 times farther than existing guns.

    Earlier, the outlet had published leaked photos of the SLRC, touted as able to bring about a revolutionary breakthrough in artillery warfare.

    ​Just how the tremendous range that the cannon is to possess will be achieved is yet to be explained by the Army.

    A special committee formed by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine is said to be currently studying the feasibility of the technology, with plans to test a prototype in 2023.

    The SLRC is being envisioned as a towed gun pulled by a heavy truck. Its vast striking range would be used to blast through enemy air and sea defences.

    However, as a land-based system, the SLRC faces limitations, as it would need airfields at sufficiently nearby locations, a secure airspace, and Air Force transports to airlift the big guns, as well as permission from foreign states to deploy it on their territory. As a truck-based weapon, it would be restricted to paved roads.

    The suggested solution, writes the outlet, might be to base some of the cannons on ships.

    One warship could potentially carry the entire four-gun battery the US Army envisioned deploying abroad, plus shells for the guns. A vessel would allow for the relocation of cannons at sea, rendering it more difficult for enemy forces to target.

    Experts recall that in 1940, most major world powers had maintained large fleets of heavily armoured warships carrying between eight and 12 guns, between 12 and 18 inches in diameter.

    Perceived as the decisive arm of naval warfare at the time, by July 1942, Word War II events such as the destruction of the German battleship The Bismarck, and the sinking of Royal Navy battleship HMS Prince of Wales and battle cruiser HMS Repulse in a naval engagement in the South China Sea on 10 December 1941 had proved the superiority of aircraft over the sea-based guns of the warships, writes Popular Mechanics.

    The Bismarck, Germany’s largest battleship and the largest fighting ship ever built by the Reich, was launched at Hamburg. Before the launching took place Adolf Hitler made a twelve-minute speech in which he declared that Bismarck laid the foundations of the Nazi state for he began the triumph over Psychological, racial and regional prejudices. A direct hit blasted the 5,000-ton Bismarck shortly before it sank in the Atlantic 400 miles West of Brest, France, following a 1,750 mile chase from Bergen, Norway, by air and sea units of the British Navy. The Bismarck's remains were discovered by Dr Robert Ballard, the man who discovered the Titanic, in 1989.
    © AP Photo
    The Bismarck, Germany’s largest battleship.

    The class of battleships has since been considered obsolete. Battleships were constrained by their relatively short firing range and susceptibility to air attacks.

    Thus, the last battleships built for the US Navy, the Iowa class, while equipped with a powerful battery of nine 16-inch Mark 7 guns, could only hit targets at a maximum distance of 23.6 miles.

    The SLRC could potentially be based by the US Navy on a new class of battleships, allowing it to strike targets at unprecedented ranges.

    It could solve the task more cheaply than a fighter that costs $45,000 an hour to fly, says Popular Mechanics, without endangering a pilot.

    Furthermore, from the North Sea, it could bombard targets in western Russia and even Moscow itself, claims the outlet.

    In the Indian Ocean a warship carrying the new weapons could target most of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Yemen, and Somalia.

    In the Pacific, the battleship could possibly bombard targets in North Korea and as far west as Beijing and Shanghai.

    Responding to the reports, Russian military expert Alexei Leonkov, director of Arsenal Otechestva magazine, slammed the SLRC project as no more than an attempt to create the cheapest possible analogue of Russia’s Tactical Operational Missile Complexes "Tochka-U" and “Iskander”.

    An exhibition missile launch from the Tochka-U tactical complex. (File)
    © Sputnik / Konstantin Chalabov
    An exhibition missile launch from the Tochka-U tactical complex. (File)

    The bi-calibre installation based on the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS), which is in service with the US Army, is noticeably inferior to them in range and accuracy, he was quoted as saying.


    NATO Chief Stoltenberg Reveals How Alliance Will ‘Respond’ to Russia’s Iskander-M Missiles
    Russian Troops Conduct Training Launches of Tochka-U Tactical Missile Complex
    US Navy’s Zumwalt Stealth Destroyer Will Soon Have Working Weapons
    Russian Defence Ministry Releases Video of Iskander Missile Launch
    US Army Pushes for Missile to Reach Moscow From Germany, as Discarded INF Treaty Sought to Prevent
    High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS), High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS), Tochka-U ballistic missile systems, Tochka-U, Iskander ballistic missile, Iskander, Iskander, US Army, US Army, US Army
    Community standardsDiscussion