06:30 GMT12 May 2021
Listen Live
    Get short URL

    Former MP George Galloway, had predicted a Trump win as far back as May 2016, as he had correctly predicted a "Leave" vote in the UK's EU referendum. But the "experts" in the US and UK mainstream media (MSM) - incidentally, often the same "experts" who told us Iraq had weapons of mass destruction in 2003 - knew better than our George.

    Galloway summed it up perfectly in one tweet, as it became clear that Donald J. Trump, against all the odds, was to become the 45th President of the United States of America:

    There was no way the unspeakably awful Donald Trump would prevail, the MSM assured us. A victory for the quite wonderful Hillary Clinton was a slam dunk. After all, everyone in our circle is going to vote for her! 

    Bill Kristol, the editor of the neocon Weekly Standard and a regular pundit on US television, scoffed at the idea that Trump would even win a single caucus or primary. 

    "Here's why Donald Trump won't win the Republican nomination" was the title of one piece in August 2015.

    Tom McCarthy said that while "knowledgeable people" thought Trump might get the nomination, "more knowledgeable people thought he wouldn't." And probably, by this logic, "the least knowledgeable people" of all thought Trump would not only win the nomination, but the White House as well. But we never heard from them. Except on channels like RT, whose "obscure pundits" — to coin a phrase of a particularly poisonous stalker, again outdid the "experts" we see regularly on elite-friendly programs like BBC's Newsnight.

    Then there's the pollsters.

    They were wrong about the 2015 UK general election, and they were wrong about the EU Referendum. And they were hopelessly wrong about the US Presidential election too. Not a single poll for instance, had Trump winning the state of Wisconsin

    In the last few days, almost all the polls showed significant leads for Hillary Clinton.

    Surely, after this latest debacle, no one can trust pollsters ever again. 

    Politicians too, with the exception of outside-the-tent populists like George Galloway and Nigel Farage, demonstrated how out of touch they were with public opinion.

    In August, Politico ran a piece entitled "GOP Insiders: Trump can't win."

    "Trump is underperforming so comprehensively… it would take video evidence of a smiling Hillary drowning a litter of puppies while terrorists surrounded her with chants of 'Death to America,' " was the verdict of an Iowa Republican.

    Well, guess what, that video evidence of Clinton as Cruella de Vil did not emerge, and The Donald still won.

    Throughout the summer we also had dire warnings in the US MSM that Trump was leading the GOP into oblivion. 

    Well, the Republicans now have the Presidency, the Senate and the House.

    Some oblivion, New York Times.

    As with Brexit "experts" in the US and UK, who are paid good money to "enlighten" us on political trends, didn't see the US election result coming.

    A plethora of articles appeared assuring us that "Trump can't win/Trump won't win." The fact that lots of people turned up at Trump's rallies proved nothing, opined the same "experts" who told us that the large crowds at Jeremy Corbyn rallies didn't mean anything either. 

    One London punter had the good sense to disregard these wise and learned articles.

    He put £200,000 (US$250,000) on a Trump victory — and won a cool half a million pounds. 

    The mutually back-slapping "pundits" who told us Trump couldn't win, met the "shock" result on the morning of November 9 with incredulity, anger — and in some cases four-letter profanities.

    One irate Oxford-educated columnist tweeted:

    "Just woke up. Jesus H Christ, America. What the f*** just done. You should be ashamed of yourselves." 

    The fact that ordinary US voters are being scolded by UK and US punditocracy for voting the "wrong way" shows us the massive disconnect between large sections of the MSM in both countries and the people. 

    Well-heeled media commentators, many of whom attended the same universities, seem dumbfounded that people who are not so well-off and not so privileged, don't see things in the same way as they do. 

    How many of those who pontificated on the US elections — and gave their "expert" opinions on how Trump couldn't possibly win — have actually spent any time in the "Rust Belt" or the poorest states of the deep south, or ever engaged with working-class Americans, struggling to make ends meet?

    If they had, they might just have anticipated what happened on election day. But they were all too busy massaging each other's egos on Twitter and predicting the result that they wanted to see, to hear the cries for change coming from the despised ‘little people', and whose opinions were ignored by  Establishment "experts" once again.

    Follow Neil Clark on Twitter @NeilClark66

    The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Sputnik.

    The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.


    What Are the Odds? Big Bucks at the Bookies as US Election Bets Heat Up in UK
    US Media Ignore Impact of WikiLeaks' Clinton Revelations - Assange's Associate
    Mainstream Media 'Still in Denial of What Happened to Them' After Trump Win
    In US Election, Mainstream Media 'Exposed as a Corporate Propaganda Bullhorn'
    Shock, Caution and Criticism: Western Media Reacts to Trump’s Election Victory
    newspapers, political establishment, experts, media bias, bias, polls, revolt, agenda, denial, mainstream media, television, rhetoric, election, 2016 US Presidential election, White House, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, World, Britain, US, United Kingdom
    Community standardsDiscussion