01:12 GMT21 September 2020
Listen Live
    Get short URL

    Russia’s “hack” of the 2016 US elections could be “considered an act of war,” says former Vice President and noted warhawk Dick Cheney, speaking at an event in New Delhi, India. He joins the chorus of US notables resorting to the groundless accusation.

    "In some quarters, that would be considered an act of war. I think it’s a kind of conduct and activity we will see going forward," said Cheney, the neocon’s neocon. "There’s no question" that the Russian government tried to "interfere" with the US elections, Cheney added.

    Despite his seemingly sadistic love of watching the US go to war, Cheney himself deferred being drafted by the US military five times during the Vietnam era. 

    Democrats have been equally quick to launch the "Russian hacking" attack for their own political gain. Rep. Jackie Speier of California said so-called Russian meddling "was an act of war, an act of hybrid warfare," according to a report by the Independent Journal Review. 

    A letter written by dozens of former intelligence, diplomatic, and military officials addressed to President Barack Obama concluded that "DNC and HRC servers alleged to have been hacked were, in fact, not hacked."

    For one, the FBI never accessed the compromised servers at the DNC, Sputnik reported.

    Bill Binney, a 35-year NSA veteran and former technical director at the spy agency, said the publication of Hillary Clinton and John Podesta’s emails were the result of an insider leak rather than an external attack. 


    US to Discuss Russia-Turkey Ceasefire Deal on Syria in Ankara Visit
    'Comparing Apples & Oranges': New Report Urges US to Develop Arctic Like Russia
    US Sanctions Over Nonproliferation Act Not to Hurt Russia - Russian Lawmaker
    Russia Files Legal Brief in US Supreme Court in Support of Bout’s Case Review
    Russia, US Confirm Absence of Major Incidents in Syrian Skies
    Russian hacking, NSA, Bill Binney, Dick Cheney, Barack Obama, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion