04:53 GMT +322 October 2019
Listen Live
    A man rests on top of a hill inside of the Oceti Sakowin camp as water protectors continue to demonstrate against plans to pass the Dakota Access pipeline near the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, near Cannon Ball, North Dakota, U.S., December 2, 2016

    As Standing Rock Protests Wind Down, Legal Struggle Continues

    © REUTERS / Lucas Jackson
    US
    Get short URL
    254
    Subscribe

    As protesters evacuate the site of the Dakota Access Pipeline that President Donald Trump has ordered to be completed, a different struggle is now to be carried out by the ‘Water Protectors:’ this time, in the courtroom.

    Radio Sputnik’s By Any Means Necessary speaks with Sandra Freeman, criminal case coordinator with the Water Protectors Legal Collective, about the legal battles that will continue after the national spotlight dims on Standing Rock. 

    Host Eugene Puryear noted the "heavily militarized police presence, despite the fact that these have been peaceful protests all along."

    Freeman explained that, "As the campaign has gone on, especially in the last six weeks, police brutality, in an individualized way, has been increasing. We’ve seen individual people picked off and brutalized, not in a mass police line and demonstration confrontation type of way." 

    Puryear pointed out the hypocrisy offered by North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum, in making the absurd claim that the main camp site must be evacuated for the safety of protesters.

    The lawyer agreed, saying, "The newest narrative that we’re seeing from the North Dakota governor’s office is that this is an 'environmental hazard,' which to be is darkly preposterous and hilarious," especially when considering the devastating impact that oil pipelines continue to have on the environment in the US. 

    "It seems like the government at all levels has been making the rules up as it goes along this whole time," said Puryear, "There’s so many rationales for why they do what they do at any given moment, but the one rationale that they don’t actually want to put out there is that they’re doing everything possible to make sure this pipeline proceeds, when that, in fact, seems to be the case."

    "That shifting rationale is what indigenous folks and people of color have been dealing with since the establishment of settler colonialism in what is now called the United States," Freeman offered, "When it comes to resource extraction, the policy will always change."

    Freeman said that since the campsites are being shut down, the "desk work" of the movement, which typically receives less attention than physical demonstrations, will continue. 

    "In some ways it’s not as gratifying because we’re not able to see it on front lines in the same way that we were in the months that the demonstrations were happening, in such a compelling way," she said, "But there is still a really compelling story to be told, of every person who came here to be with their family, or as allies to put themselves on the line, and to present themselves in support of indigenous sovereignty and in support of clean water. Those stories still remain to be told, and I hope that the world continues to pay attention."

    Related:

    White House Hints at Trump Wanting to Complete Dakota Access Pipeline
    Trump Order to Complete Dakota Pipeline Disregards Native American Rights
    TransCanada Reapplies to Build Keystone XL Pipeline
    Pipeline Leak in US State of Iowa Spills 82,000 Gallons of Diesel Fuel
    Iowa Pipeline Leak Causes 138,600 Gallons of Diesel to Drain
    Tags:
    legal hurdles, legal challenge, Protests, Dakota Access Pipeline, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, Standing Rock Sioux reservation, North Dakota
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik