16:05 GMT26 October 2020
Listen Live
    US
    Get short URL
    388
    Subscribe

    While the US marks the 15th anniversary of 9/11 attacks, security experts warn that the terrorist threat is worse now than it was before 2001. Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania and author of the book "Trapped in the War on Terror" Ian Lustick told Radio Sputnik why global terrorism remains undefeated.

    “Terror itself was the biggest recruitment tool for the terrorists and it was a fundamental mistake to declare war on terrorists akin to declaring war on an enemy akin to the Nazis in WWII, because this elevates terrorists in the eyes of the world and encourages them to recruit people for attacks. This makes the problem even worse,” Ian Lustick said.

    He added that the Obama Administration had tried, sometimes successfully, to retreat from the idea of fighting a war against terrorists and make them look more like criminals.

    “Because of the mistakes made by the Bush Administration by launching a war in Iraq, the capacities of these [terrorist] groups expanded and they now acted as if they were major players on the world stage,” Professor Lustick added.

    When asked whether the world nations were eventually going to win that war against terrorists, he said no, as long as they defined this as a war on terror, because there will always be lunatics ready to kill.

    “So there will always be terrorism, just like there will always be cancer and poverty. To fight a war against something that will always be around makes sure that you will be defeated.”

    He added that people should realize that terrorism is one of the smaller risks, but for psychological reasons “it scares people  more than suicides, work accidents or even slipping and hurting your head.”

    “These things are much more dangerous, but the idea that there are malevolent purposes behind that kind of things that scares people. Because it scares people, it gives politicians, who are unscrupulous, the opportunity to raise issues that discredit sensible government policies and urge government to act in a way that will actually backfire and serve the terrorists. That’s exactly what the Iraq war was,” Ian Lustick noted.

    Answering a question if some people were making money off this, he spoke about the “irresistibility” of a war of any kind, because in a war everyone, from universities to companies to bureaucrats, says they are crucial to the war effort in order to get more contracts and more funds.

    “This is exactly what has happened in the US and in this case [Daesh] and our media hysteria did their best to keep that whirlwind of tension,” Ian Lustick emphasized.

    On September 11, 2001 a group of al-Qaeda-trained terrorists hijacked four planes, two of which were crashed into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City,  the third into  the Pentagon headquarters in Washington and the fourth crashed in a field in rural Pennsylvania.

    The fall of the World Trade Center and the loss of over 3,000 lives in the 9/11 attacks prompted then-US President George W. Bush to declare a "war on terror" a few weeks later.

    Related:

    US Post-9/11 ‘War on Terror’ Sparked Surge in Terrorist Attacks Globally
    15 Years and Billions of Dollars: US ‘at a Stalemate’ in its War on Terror
    Tags:
    media hysteria, malevolent purposes, War on Terror, money, University of Pennsylvania, Daesh, al-Qaeda, Pentagon, Ian Lustick, George W. Bush, US
    Community standardsDiscussion