06:07 GMT +321 January 2020
Listen Live
    Get short URL

    In struggling to attract voters in the ongoing US presidential run, all the nominees have revealed a lack a genuine understanding on how to defeat Daesh, ex-CIA analyst Paul R. Pillar told Radio Sputnik.

    By proposing additional forces in Syria, US presidential candidates show that they lack knowledge on the Daesh issue, the analyst claimed. He underscored that only a few presidential candidates specifically talk about the use of ground forces; others just call for unspecified action against Daesh, without a clear understanding of the challenges.

    Making such declarations, politicians attempt to use the public’s fear of terrorism for their own benefit, suggested the analyst, adding that, candidates pursue only one goal: to gain the attention of voters.

    “We have a rather simple view that if a group establishes itself on the ground in a faraway place like Syria, this translates directly into a terrorist threat in the West. But there is simply no evidence of that,” Pillar said, adding that it wasn’t proven that the San Bernardino attackers who killed 14 people were associated with Daesh.

    The expert explained that the risks of putting boots on ground in Syria haven’t been thoroughly assessed. Pillar asserted that it is unclear whether deploying American servicemen in a ground offensive on the other side of the world would have a positive result.

    Pillar claims that supporters of a ground offensive also underestimate the possibility of collateral damage.
    A key problem, Pillar highlighted, is that it’s impossible to predict what the consequences of a ground operation in Syria – even a successful one – would be.

    “What you would leave [in Syria] is a vacuum and a chaotic situation, which only play into the hands of extremists, whether they carry the label of ISIS or of another group,” Pillar said.

    Pillar said that a US invasion in Syria would have unpredictable outcomes, comparable to those in Iraq.

    “Daesh was born in Iraq during the civil war that was triggered by the US-led invasion in 2003. And then it got big boost, when the Syrian war broke out and moved there and exploited that situation. The main thing we have to do is to tamp down this conflict.”

    The first thing that should be done in Syria is to reduce the violence, Pillar said. The overall crisis can be resolved at the negotiating table, he asserted, with the assistance of outside powers including the US and Russia.


    Tunisia Detains 11 People Involved in Daesh Financing, Recruitment
    US Aircraft Carrier Truman Narrowly Avoids Collision With Iranian Rockets
    Investigation Launched Into Official Orgy During Brussels Lockdown
    Multipolar World ‘Becoming True Possibility’ and US Needs to Adjust to It
    US Expects Iraq to Beat Daesh on ItsTerritory in 2 to 5 Years
    military campaign, ground offensive, 2016 US Presidential Run, Iraq, Syria, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik