09:13 GMT +317 November 2019
Listen Live
    Two russian Su-30 land at airfield near Latakia

    All Parties Benefit From Russian Operation in Syria – UK Media

    © Sputnik / Dmitri Vinogradov
    Middle East
    Get short URL
    Russia Versus ISIL in Syria (618)
    10506
    Subscribe

    Russia is the player that can tip the balance of forces in Syria and bring the conflict closer to the end, a British reporter claims.

    One of the main problems getting in the way of the discontinuation or de-escalation of the ongoing conflict in Syria is that all parties in this standoff are strong enough to defend “their corners,” but at the same time a lack of power to “checkmate” their opponents, a Middle East expert Patrick Cockburn wrote in his blog for the Independent.

    According to Cockburn, Moscow’s interference in the war can bear fruit: Russia is the power which can both change the game and influence its allies in this process.

    “[I]t is better to have Russia fully involved in Syria than on the sidelines so it has the opportunity to help regain control over a situation that long ago spun out of control. It can keep Assad in power in Damascus, but the power to do so means that it can also modify his behavior and force movement towards reducing violence, local ceasefires and sharing power regionally," Cockburn wrote.

    The columnist highlighted that the stance of Washington and its allies on the Syrian problem is absurdly based on the belief that the root of all troubles is Assad. Upholding this principle would either lead to further disintegration of Syria in the pattern of Iraq and Libya, or to less destructive consequences, which could be complicated by active warfare in country.

    The collapse of the USSR in 1991 tilted the global balance of power that resulted in the waging of new wars in the Middle East and Northern Africa. The US wasn’t resisted by any major power when it was meddling in the internal affairs of countries, setting up puppet regimes. Moreover, political leaders like Nicolas Sarkozy and David Cameron praised the toppling of Muammar Gaddafi in Syria, but they met with indifference the devolving of the country into anarchy and political instability.

    Cockburn distinguished several inner and outer fronts that are warring with one another over the territory of Syria, which appears to be a tangle of contradictions.

    For instance, the conflict between al-Assad and “rebels” is overlapping with the standoff between Sunni and Shiite groups as well as the deadlock between Turks, Kurds, Arabs. Iran is resisting Saudi Arabia and the US is confronting Russia. And there is also the ISIL militant group that fights against everybody all at once. After Western plans to overthrow Assad during the period between 2011 and 2012 failed, they fell short of developing a new strategy.

    The journalist summed up that the fight against ISIL should unify those sides that are now combating jihadists separately. Russia and Iran should be involved in the negotiation process to resolve the crisis. And Assad must keep the President’s chair, but stop shelling the zones controlled by opposition.

    He concluded by saying that such powers as Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia and some of the Gulf monarchies are in control of many of the groups in conflict in Syria, but they will pursue their own goals rather than look for a compromise.

    Topic:
    Russia Versus ISIL in Syria (618)

    Related:

    Syrians View Russians as Heroes – British Journalist
    US Does Not Admit Its Mistakes, But Criticizes Others – Bundestag Member
    Cameron Urges Russia to Join US, UK in Anti-ISIL Coalition
    Tags:
    Daesh, Syrian conflict, Bashar al-Assad, Syria, United States, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik