02:21 GMT +320 November 2019
Listen Live
    A protester stands outside the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom after the hearing on British Prime Minister Boris Johnson's decision to prorogue parliament ahead of Brexit, in London, Britain September 24, 2019

    Leaked Docs Reveal Attorney General Told Boris Johnson UK Parliament Suspension Was Lawful

    Get short URL

    The UK Parliament will reconvene on Wednesday after the Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that its suspension was unlawful. Prime Minister Boris Johnson responded by saying he disagrees strongly with the ruling but respects the court's decision.

    Boris Johnson's Attorney General, Sir Geoffrey Cox, has been accused of advising Boris Johnson that the suspension of parliament was lawful, according to an anonymous leak to Sky News. According to Sky, Boris Johnson was told that "any accusations of unlawfulness or constitutional outrage were motivated by political considerations."

    Last week, Scottish Courts released the text of conversations between cabinet ministers, with certain redacted sections. Sky News subsequently received a copy of the redacted sections, which revealed Cox saying that prorogation was legal and anyone disputing it was politically motivated.

    The redacted conversation reads: "The attorney general said that his advice on the question of the law is that this was lawful and within the constitution."

    "Any accusations of unlawfulness or constitutional outrage were motivated by political considerations. The proposal was compatible with the provisions of the NIEFF 2019."

    ​In response to rulings by the Supreme Court on Tuesday, Boris Johnson said he would "respect" the ruling despite strongly disagreeing with it.

    "There are a lot of people who want to frustrate Brexit. There are a lot of people who want to stop this country coming out of the EU," said Johnson, as he prepared to fly back from New York.

    The Supreme Court found on Tuesday that the prorogation was in fact unlawful after eleven judges unanimously found that it had the effect of frustrating parliament.

    Britain’s most senior judge, Lady Hale, said that the advice Johnson gave to the Queen was unlawful and said: “Parliament, as elected representatives of the people, has a right to a voice... the effect on our elected democracy was extreme.”

    They court also found that the prorogation was "void and of no effect," which was met with an immediate call by House Speaker John Bercow to recall parliament on Wednesday 25 September.

    The motion was brought to the Supreme Court after a Scottish Court ruled that Johnson's prorogation decision was unlawful as it was "motivated by the improper purpose of stymieing parliament" rather than the reason officially given by the government.

    The Prime Minister had originally claimed that the five-week suspension of parliament was to make way for a Queen's speech to outline the government's legislative agenda. 





    UK Supreme Court to Rule on Boris Johnson’s Suspension of Parliament - Video
    Johnson Says He Will Respect the Supreme Court Ruling That His Parliament Prorogation Was Illegal
    Twitter Explodes After House of Commons Speaker Bercow Demands Parliament Return to Business
    Trump Says US Goal ‘Not to Go With Endless Wars’
    Supreme Court, General Election, suspension, leave, Boris Johnson
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik