03:57 GMT23 October 2020
Listen Live
    Get short URL

    According to a September Yle/Taloustutkimus poll, more Finnish citizens are supporting Finland's Finns Party. The party stands for an anti-immigration agenda after the Turku stabbing attack in August.

    MOSCOW (Sputnik) — Hungary will challenge the EU court's ruling on quotas for refugee relocation, Hungarian Minister of Human Resources Zoltan Balog said.

    "I believe that we will challenge this ruling through legal means as long as we have them, because we consider this decision politically motivated and irresponsible," Balog told Deutschlandfunk radio station in an interview.

    Balog did not specify exactly how Hungary would challenge the court decision, adding that it is up to lawyers.

    On Wednesday, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) dismissed the case brought by Hungary and Slovakia against the mandatory quotas for resettlement of refugees from Italy and Greece to other bloc's member states.

    In 2015, the heads of the EU interior ministries adopted the European Commission’s proposal on the distribution of 160,000 undocumented migrants in Italy and Greece. In its latest report on migrant relocation and resettlement, published on May 16, the European Commission said the number of those relocated stood at 18,418. However, it also noted that countries like Austria, Hungary and Poland remained the only EU states that had not relocated a single person.

    Moreover, in 2016, Hungary held a referendum on the EU migrant resettlement quota, which failed due to low voter turnout. However, some 95 percent of the voters who took part in the referendum rejected the quota plan.


    Putin, Hungary's Orban Exchange Views on European Agenda
    Russian-Hungarian Trade Sees 27% Increase in 2017 Amid EU Anti-Russia Sanctions
    Four Migrants Trying to Enter EU Detained at Ukrainian-Hungarian Border
    Poland Likely to Evade EU Sanctions With Support of Hungary, UK, Czech Republic
    Refugee quota, European Union, Hungary, Slovakia
    Community standardsDiscussion