15:08 GMT04 August 2020

COVID-19 global data

Confirmed cases:

LIVE:Tropical Storm Isaias Moves Up the US East Coast - Video

Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ)

Amnesty Int'l Lauds ‘Historic’ UK Ruling on Rights Breaches by Spy Agencies

© Photo : British Ministry of Defence

15:02 GMT 06.02.2015(updated 15:36 GMT 06.02.2015) Get short URL

Subscribe

https://cdn1.img.sputniknews.com/i/logo-itemprop.png

Sputnik International

https://cdn2.img.sputniknews.com/i/logo.png

Sputnik

https://cdn2.img.sputniknews.com/i/logo.png

https://sputniknews.com/europe/201502061017891233/

The human rights watchdog commended the Investigatory Powers Tribunal's judgment accusing the UK spy networks of sharing surveillance data collected by NSA.

A page of the British GCHQ official website, the government electronic and communications spy agency

© AP Photo /

British Intel Agency Found Guilty of Human Rights Breach by Secret Court

MOSCOW (Sputnik) — Amnesty International and several other rights pressure groups announced a "historic victory" in the fight for privacy and freedom of speech against UK and US intelligence services whose mass surveillance programs were found on Friday to be in violation of basic human rights.

"This is an historic victory in the age-old battle for the right to privacy and free expression," Amnesty International UK's legal program director, Rachel Logan, said as quoted in a statement published on the watchdog's website.

#GCHQ’s receipt of private communications intercepted by the NSA through its mass surveillance programmes Prism&Upstream was illegal #IPTL
— Rachel Logan (@rachelrlogan) 6 февраля 2015

This came after UK's top intelligence court upheld on Friday a complaint by Amnesty, Liberty, Privacy International, the American Civil Liberties Union and several others against Britain's spy agencies GCHQ, MI5 and MI6.

Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ)

© Photo : British Ministry of Defence

Rights Group Says UK Journalist Privacy Threatened by GCHQ

The Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) passed judgment accusing the UK spy networks of sharing surveillance data collected by US National Security Agency (NSA). The NSA was revealed in 2013 to be scooping up millions of telephone calls, faxes, emails, and other types of private communications from sources all over the world.

The Tribunal's ruling was the first to implicate UK secret services since its establishment 15 years ago.

The IPT added that UK spy agencies are now compliant with the European Convention for Human Rights. Amnesty said it "strongly disagrees" with this second part of the ruling, and will bring further challenges against global unwarranted citizen surveillance at the European Court of Human Rights.

Illegal snooping by GCHQ. It's not the longest judgement in the world. But it couldn't be clearer pic.twitter.com/oIq5k2a8C5
— alan rusbridger (@arusbridger) 6 февраля 2015

Related:: Watchdog Says UK Police Ignores Journalists Freedom of Speech

: US Investigative Journalists Believe They Are Monitored by Government

: Rights Group Says UK Journalist Privacy Threatened by GCHQ

: British Spies Threaten to End Cooperation With Germany Over NSA Probe

Tags:

Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), MI6, MI5, NSA, GCHQ, Amnesty International, Rachel Logan, Britain

Community standardsDiscussion

Сomment
Thank you! Your comment will be reviewed by the moderator for compliance with the Rules
Add more
Post limit reached. Please try again in a minute.
Your comment contains a link, so it can't be published on our site

Сomment

Community standards

The fact of registration and authorization of users on Sputnik websites via users’ account or accounts on social networks indicates acceptance of these rules.

Users are obliged abide by national and international laws. Users are obliged to speak respectfully to the other participants in the discussion, readers and individuals referenced in the posts.

The websites’ administration has the right to delete comments made in languages other than the language of the majority of the websites’ content.

In all language versions of the sputniknews.com websites any comments posted can be edited.

A user comment will be deleted if it:

does not correspond with the subject of the post;
promotes hatred and discrimination on racial, ethnic, sexual, religious or social basis or violates the rights of minorities;
violates the rights of minors, causing them harm in any form, including moral damage;
contains ideas of extremist nature or calls for other illegal activities;
contains insults, threats to other users, individuals or specific organizations, denigrates dignity or undermines business reputations;
contains insults or messages expressing disrespect to Sputnik;
violates privacy, distributes personal data of third parties without their consent or violates privacy of correspondence;
describes or references scenes of violence, cruelty to animals;
contains information about methods of suicide, incites to commit suicide;
pursues commercial objectives, contains improper advertising, unlawful political advertisement or links to other online resources containing such information;
promotes products or services of third parties without proper authorization;
contains offensive language or profanity and its derivatives, as well as hints of the use of lexical items falling within this definition;
contains spam, advertises spamming, mass mailing services and promotes get-rich-quick schemes;
promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;
contains links to viruses and malicious software;
is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");
“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;
violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");
doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.

The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.

Users can initiate the recovery of their account / unlock access by contacting the moderators at moderator@sputniknews.com

The letter must contain:

Subject - the restoration of account / unlock access
User ID
An explanation of the actions which were in violation of the rules above and resulted in the lock.

If the moderators deem it possible to restore the account / unlock access, it will be done.

In the case of repeated violations of the rules above resulting in a second block of a user’s account, access cannot be restored.

To contact the team of moderators, write to moderator@sputniknews.com