Listen Live
    Chelsea Manning's Statement on Release from Jail and Second Grand Jury Subpeona

    ‘She Might Win’: Manning’s Daily Fines Could Become Target of Judicial Oversight

    © Photo: YouTube/Chelsea Manning
    Opinion
    Get short URL
    1132
    Subscribe

    Whistleblower Chelsea Manning’s freedom remains in limbo after a May 16 court order found her in contempt of a grand jury for her refusal to testify about WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange. As of June 15, Manning now also has to pay a series of daily, tiered fines that her lawyers wholeheartedly reject in terms of legality.

    Saturday marked the beginning of daily fines leveled against a jailed Manning due to her refusal to work with federal investigators.

    “If Chelsea Manning does not purge herself of contempt within 30 days of this Order, she shall incur a conditional fine of $500 per day until such time as she purges herself of contempt,” US District Judge Anthony Trenga’s May 16 order noted. That fine will double to $1,000 per day on July 15.


    Appearing on Radio Sputnik’s Loud & Clear with hosts Brian Becker and John Kiriakou Monday, Kevin Gosztola, a journalist with Shadowproof, explained that the federal government is at a loss because Manning is showing that “she’s not going to change her mind.”

    Furthermore, judicial oversight may prove to be the 31-year-old’s lifeline.

    “No matter whether it’s going to jail or giving a person fines, these are supposed to be coercive in the sense that the court believes it’s going to move the person to testify, or the government believes reasonably that it’s going to move the person to testify,” Gosztola told the hosts, pointing out that Manning and her lawyers disputed the grounds of the sanctions back in May.

    However, Manning’s lawyers have yet to release any updates, leaving Gosztola to believe her motion has not progressed since.

    Gosztola pointed out to Loud & Clear that the US government is operating within a conspiratory framework in order to hook a bigger fish: Julian Assange. That is, if the WikiLeaks co-founder is actually extradited from the UK.

    “They actually don’t need Chelsea Manning’s testimony to go forward,” Becker said, also bringing up the 18-count superseding indictment against Assange that hinges on the 1917 Espionage Act’s vagueness.

    “Their whole idea is that Julian Assange recruited Chelsea Manning to work for him and purloin and steal documents on behalf of WikiLeaks,” Gosztola pointed out, despite Manning saying, in a February 2013 statement to the judge, that she was an independent party in selecting and releasing the data. WikiLeaks merely acted as the publisher of said material, though Manning did attempt to contact other outlets such as the New York Times and the Washington Post.

    Gosztola ended by clarifying that because the fines will have Manning listed as the one charged, the US judicial system does allow her to challenge their legality. “She might win and have a court decide this was unconstitutional.”

    Related:

    Assange’s Supporters Protest in London Amid Fears of His Extradition (VIDEO)
    Imprisoned Swedish Programmer's Dad: Ola Bini's Arrest 'All About Assange'
    'Blood on Their Hands': Activists Lash Out at MSM Amid Assange Extradition Hearing
    Assange Extradition Trial Scheduled for February, Will Justice Be Served?
    US Set to Question Assange-Linked Man Jailed by Ecuador – Reports
    Tags:
    Espionage Act, US Espionage Act, 1917 Espionage Act, grand jury, Assange, Sanctions, fines, Chelsea Manning
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik