01:32 GMT +319 November 2018
Listen Live
    President of Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) Jin Liqun greets to journalists as he arrives at a news conference in Beijing January 17, 2016

    Aftershocks of Crisis in Asia Will be Felt by China’s Economic Partners - Prof

    © REUTERS / Kim Kyung-Hoon
    Opinion
    Get short URL
    120

    Asia could face a financial crisis that surpasses previous crises in its impact, according to the head of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank - Jin Liqun.

    Sputnik has discussed the possibility of a crisis in Asia with Christopher Bovis, professor of international business law at the University of Hull in England.

    Sputnik: The head of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank warned of a crisis tougher than in the 90's amid US tariffs. How inevitable is it?

    Christopher Bovis: It's a very valid comment. It's extremely likely that we have an escalation of a trade war between the United States and China and that would lead to a serious crisis because we do not have currently, the world does not have the institutional infrastructure to deal with tariff wars.

    Sputnik: This is just because of the tariff war that's going on or are there other factors that are also possible contributors or risk factors for a financial crisis?

    Christopher Bovis: We need to look at the undermining and underlying factors between the relationship of the two superpowers, China and the United States; and there's two reasons for that. The first is the imbalances in trade. The regional trade imbalances as the existing trade war revealed is that China profited extraordinarily in the last two decades out of the trade between the US and, of course, the North American parties.

    Therefore, it created not only the side effects of the trade imbalance which is the jobs, the employment and also the loss of competitiveness, but mainly, and the most important thing is, the ability to have a responsible system to address these issues domestically. That's why you have the American administration going to war with the Chinese administration about putting import duties and tariffs on anything that is crucial for the development of both their economies.

    READ MORE: Venezuela Ditches the Greenback, Switches to Euros and Yuan: Consequences?

    The other part is that most countries today, most economies today are addicted to debt, debt and borrowing becomes a serious synonymous part of the armory of any macroeconomic policy and that contributes to huge problems because it cannot take away any part of action that relates to autonomous responses.

    Sputnik: We have actually seen quite a bit of volatility on the back of various tariffs that the US has imposed on Chinese goods all across Asian markets, which countries are the most susceptible? Is China, which is the second largest economy in the world, are they the most susceptible or are there other countries in Asia that are going to feel the bite of these tariffs and the bite of this trade war even more?

    Christopher Bovis: The aftershocks of the trade war will be felt by most parties that surround China as an economic partner. So all the countries that rely on China to prosper and deal with China in order to furnish exports towards other parts of the world will suffer. The fact that they have relatively weak economies, they're emerging economies and they have currencies that are susceptible to devaluation creates more problems.

    In fact, it doesn't solve the problem, it augments the problem because the imports to these economies are much more expensive than the exports. Therefore, it's sinking things further down into the abyss of uncertainty. It requires immediate reaction.

    Sputnik: If the currencies were to feel the bite of a crisis wouldn't that actually spur an increase in exports on the back of those lower prices?

    Christopher Bovis: China will easily take on any potential full-fledged war between the United States and itself because they have the mighty sums. They have also the currency to participate in international monetary systems in order to avoid any side effects of the trade war, the imposition of tariffs. The other economies, the emerging economies do not have that possibility. In fact, they have debt, China has debt, but it has tremendous amount of liquidity, it can fight back and it can win back.

    READ MORE: G20 Finance Heads Warn Trade Wars to Dumpen Global Growth — Russian Central Bank

    The other parties that are associated with China will have tremendous difficulty in understanding, first of all, the speed of reaction. They have to react pretty quickly, and the most important thing — the correct reaction, devaluing your currency is not the right solution. In fact, it's the wrong solution because it takes the entire economy further down into debt.

    Sputnik: Do you think that there is actually a possibility that some countries may benefit from the trade war in Asian countries? We've already seen some kind of a shift towards countries like Vietnam, Cambodia for producing certain items that were traditionally made in China. Do you think that a trade war could actually see some kind of benefit tripling down, with the imposed tariffs, a shift towards goods coming from other countries in Asia, in Southeast Asia?

    Christopher Bovis: Possibly. It's very possible in the short-term. Countries and economies that are swift in reacting towards the new era of world trade order; that are also aligning themselves economically, microeconomically within their own economies and countries allowing themselves to invest and also the ability to be flexible in labor conditions, in conditions relating to standards to furnish the goods and services to the main contractor in order to allow the exports to the final destination.

    You see Vietnam, you see Singapore, you see other countries allowing that part of the world that is closely associated with China benefiting quite well and quite recently benefiting from these types of arrangements of economic hostilities between China and the United States. But this is short-term only because eventually it will come to a point that you also need to reinvent a new set of rules. Otherwise allowing a kind of a reactory policy into something which is a hostility for economic environment is not long-term, it is not conducive to investment, is not producing any certainty for investors and also for the domestic economy to grow positively in the years to come.

    The views expressed in this article are solely those of Christopher Bovis and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Sputnik.

    Related:

    EU, Italy Need to 'Find Solutions' on Budget - Finance Commissioner
    French Finance Minister Pulls Out of Riyadh Conference Amid Khashoggi Case Probe
    Russia May Stop Issuing Eurobonds Altogether in 2019 – Deputy Finance Minister
    Patisserie Valerie Finance Chief Arrested, Company Faces Uncertain Future
    Tags:
    trade war, economy, finance, Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), United States, Asia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik