The anti-infidel message contained in textbooks that were being disseminated in refugee camps in Pakistan could easily be repurposed by those who seek to indoctrinate Afghan youths to support the anti-NATO struggle, according to a professor at New York University.
MOSCOW, December 8 (Sputnik) — US-funded educational aid to Afghanistan in the 1980s may have helped exacerbate the religious conflict in the country, Al Jazeera America reports.
According to Dana Burde, a professor at New York University, the anti-infidel message contained in textbooks like “The Alphabet of Jihad Literacy” that were being disseminated in refugee camps in Pakistan could easily be repurposed by those who seek to indoctrinate Afghan youths to support the anti-NATO struggle.
The majority of such books promote violence in the name of Islam; Professor Burde managed to obtain several copies. Along with vilifying Soviets and communists in general, the textbooks also describe all nonbelievers as enemies.
Furthermore, US educational funding in Afghanistan after 9/11 and the subsequent US-led War in Afghanistan may also have backfired, the professor notes, according to Al Jazeera. As the education program’s goal at that time was to help stabilize the country, the majority of the funding was directed to the regions at the heart of the ongoing insurgency. As a result, the more peaceful communities were thus often passed over in terms of support, and started feeling more resentful toward foreigners and the central government, Professor Burde asserts.
The publication of these textbooks that were distributed among the Afghan refugees in the 1980s was funded by USAID; their content was written by mujahedeen groups with the support of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency and the CIA. Proponents of the US-led mission to Afghanistan commonly cite educational statistics as evidence that the war there was a success.
The fact of registration and authorization of users on Sputnik websites via users’ account or accounts on social networks indicates acceptance of these rules.
Users are obliged abide by national and international laws. Users are obliged to speak respectfully to the other participants in the discussion, readers and individuals referenced in the posts.
The websites’ administration has the right to delete comments made in languages other than the language of the majority of the websites’ content.
In all language versions of the sputniknews.com websites any comments posted can be edited.
A user comment will be deleted if it:
does not correspond with the subject of the post;
promotes hatred and discrimination on racial, ethnic, sexual, religious or social basis or violates the rights of minorities;
violates the rights of minors, causing them harm in any form, including moral damage;
contains ideas of extremist nature or calls for other illegal activities;
contains insults, threats to other users, individuals or specific organizations, denigrates dignity or undermines business reputations;
contains insults or messages expressing disrespect to Sputnik;
violates privacy, distributes personal data of third parties without their consent or violates privacy of correspondence;
describes or references scenes of violence, cruelty to animals;
contains information about methods of suicide, incites to commit suicide;
pursues commercial objectives, contains improper advertising, unlawful political advertisement or links to other online resources containing such information;
promotes products or services of third parties without proper authorization;
contains offensive language or profanity and its derivatives, as well as hints of the use of lexical items falling within this definition;
contains spam, advertises spamming, mass mailing services and promotes get-rich-quick schemes;
promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;
contains links to viruses and malicious software;
is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");
“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;
violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");
doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.
The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.