09:05 GMT +319 January 2020
Listen Live
    Get short URL

    WASHINGTON (Sputnik) - The United States is considering raising the price for stationing US military troops in allied countries, Bloomberg reported on Friday.

    The US administration is drawing up plans for Germany, Japan and eventually other countries hosting US troops to pay the full price for the deployment of American soldiers in their respective countries, plus 50 percent or more for the privilege of hosting them, Bloomberg reported, citing a dozen administration officials and people briefed on the matter.

    READ MORE: Trump Says US Can Leave Small Force in Syria Amid Troops Pullout

    According to the report, nations currently hosting US forces could be asked to pay five to six times as much as they do now under the so-called "Cost Plus 50" formula.

    US President Donald Trump, who frequently criticizes US allies for their lack of defence spending, has championed the idea for months, the report said. Officials caution that "Cost Plus 50" is one of many ideas under consideration, and it may be toned down.

    Despite the proposal's early stage, it has sent "shock waves" through the US departments of Defence and State, where officials fear the proposal could further alienate allies in Asia and Europe already questioning Trump's commitment to them, the report said.

    Since taking office in January 2017, US President Donald Trump has repeatedly pressed other NATO member states to meet their annual defence spending obligations within the alliance.

    Only five out of 29 NATO members — Estonia, Greece, Latvia, the United Kingdom, and the United States — currently meet their commitment to spend 2 percent of their GDP on defence, according to NATO.


    No Final Agreement Reached on Boosting US Troops in Poland - Pentagon
    US Urges Allies to Send 1,500 Troops to Syria to Create Safe Zone – Reports
    Washington & Baghdad Agree to Withdraw US Troops From Syria Via Iraq - Official
    US troops, Donald Trump, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik