04:44 GMT20 June 2021
Listen Live
    Get short URL
    0 25

    US Department of Justice announced that a US district court ruled that a subsidiary of the world’s largest oilfield services company Schlumberger must pay $232.7 million penalty for violating US trade sanctions against Iran and Sudan.

    WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — A US district court ruled that a subsidiary of the world’s largest oilfield services company Schlumberger must pay $232.7 million penalty for violating US trade sanctions against Iran and Sudan, according to a US Department of Justice (DOJ) press release.

    “The US District Court of the District of Columbia entered a formal judgment yesterday memorializing the sentence requiring Schlumberger Oilfield Holdings Ltd.(SOHL), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Schlumberger Ltd, to pay a $232,708,356 penalty to the United States for conspiring to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by willfully facilitating illegal transactions and engaging in trade with Iran and Sudan,” the release said on Thursday.

    On March 25, SOHL filed a guilty plea agreement stating it “knowingly and willfully” violated US sanctions against Iran and Sudan.

    The federal court in the District of Columbia approved the plea agreement, requiring SOHL to “submit to a three-year period of corporate probation as well as agree to continue to cooperate with the US government,” the release stated.

    The DOJ stressed in the release that such ruling should discourage other multinational corporations from working with countries subject to US economic sanctions.

    The IEEPA, enacted in 1977, authorizes US presidents to regulate commerce in response to any foreign threat to the United States. At present, more than a dozen countries, including Iran and Sudan, are subject to sanctions under the act.


    North Carolina Slaps Duke Energy With $25 Million Fine For Pollution
    Google Faces Fine if Guilty of Distorting Searches – European Commission
    fine, US Justice Department, Schlumberger, US
    Community standardsDiscussion