16:24 GMT +323 October 2019
Listen Live
    The family of Michael Brown, the unarmed teenager whose death at the hands of police in Ferguson, Mo. sparked protests across the country, has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the city.

    Michael Brown Family Sues Ferguson, Darren Wilson

    © AP Photo / Jeff Roberson
    US
    Get short URL
    0 43
    Subscribe

    The family of Michael Brown, the unarmed teenager whose death at the hands of police in Ferguson, Mo. sparked protests across the country, has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the city that asks for $75,000 in compensation, changes to police practices and unspecified punitive damages.

    The suit cites a "pattern and practice of using unreasonable and excessive force," and police practices that "often escalate encounters" with residents, particularly African-Americans like 18-year-old Brown.  

    In addition to the city of Ferguson, the lawsuit names former Officer Darren Wilson, the white cop who shot Brown and whose actions were ruled justified, and former Police Chief Thomas Jackson as defendants. Wilson resigned in November after a grand jury declined to indict him, and Jackson resigned in March following a scathing Justice Department civil rights report about his department. 

    Attorneys Anthony Gray and Benjamin Crump addressed reporters after the suit was filed in St. Louis, with Brown's parents present but remaining silent. The filing was expected as the family announced last month they would pursue a civil suit once the Department of Justice concluded it could not pursue Wilson on civil rights charges. 

    According to the suit, Officer Wilson "unjustifiably shot and killed (Brown), using an unnecessary and unreasonable amount (of) force in violation of (Brown's) constitutionally guaranteed right to life."

    The suit also alleges various instances of mishandling evidence and otherwise compromising the integrity of the investigation. In particular it accuses Wilson of "destroying evidence" when he washed blood off his hands and in bagging the gun he shot Brown with. 

    Gray claimed that, though the evidence in the suit remains the same, "the presentation of that evidence" will be the key to their case, disputing some central elements of the original shooting investigation and subsequent proceedings. 

    The lawsuit's version of events does not, for example, include Wilson's claim that there was a struggle between himself and Brown over the officer's weapon. Gray also said they will address changes in Wilson's story over time: "It's been refined; it's been perfected."

    The burden of proof in a civil trial is less than for criminal proceedings; instead of proving a case "beyond a reasonable doubt", plaintiffs have to prove "a preponderance of evidence," which the Brown family's attorneys were confident about. 

    "There were other alternatives available to (Officer Wilson)," Gray said explaining the essence of the Brown family's case. "He did not have to kill Michael Brown."

    Related:

    Images From Ferguson Receive Pulitzer Prize for Breaking News Photography
    US National Guard Referred to Ferguson Protesters as ‘Enemy Forces’
    Read the Racist Emails That Cost Three Ferguson Officials Their Jobs
    Police to Pay for Tear Gas Use on Ferguson Protesters
    Tags:
    compensation, damages, civil suit, Police, wrongful death lawsuit, lawsuit, Ferguson Police Department, Thomas Jackson, Darren Wilson, Michael Brown, St. Louis, Missouri, Ferguson
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik