01:53 GMT +327 March 2017
    The universe.

    Scientists Prepare to Challenge Einstein Theory’s Key Tenet

    © Flickr/ John Smith Follow
    Get short URL

    A joint team of scientists from the UK and Canada have developed a theory they claim will challenge a cornerstone of physics: the speed of light.

    A key principle in modern physics is that light and electromagnetic waves, if measured in a vacuum, always travel at the same speed.

    Professor João Magueijo from Imperial College London, and Dr. Niayesh Afshordi at the Perimeter Institute in Canada, now suggest that the speed of light, which has been accepted as a constant, could be variable. In particular, they suggest in the journal Physical Review D that, long ago, mere moments from when the universe appeared, light traveled much more quickly than it does today.

    According to the scientists, the known universe, filled with galaxies, stars and gas, became possible thanks to tiny fluctuations in the density of the matter of the early universe, which, at the time, resembled a very hot, opaque, plasma fog.

    Fluctuations in density occurred because the speed of light was not stable, the scientists claim. They suggest that gravity and light traveled at different speeds, with gravity moving more slowly. Later, as the universe expanded and became cooler, light traveled more slowly, causing the speed of light and the speed of gravity to become equal.

    Magueijo and Afshordi say that imprints of those fluctuations can be observed in the cosmic microwave background, or "relic radiation," a thermal radiation left in interstellar space from the period immediately following the Big Bang, and calculated using a "spectral index." The new theory puts the figure very close to current observations. Further observations, conducted with more sensitive measuring devices, will show a similar figure, and will prove them right, the scientists say.

    In current physics and cosmology, the "inflation" theory is considered to be mainstream. This theory, based on a constant speed of light, suggests that our universe expanded at variable speeds, as the initial expansion is thought to have been very fast, but then slowed for an as-yet-unexplained reason.

    Both theories struggle to solve the so-called horizon problem. The known universe, despite the abovementioned smaller fluctuations, is thought to have a more or less similar density in any direction. If light always travels with the same speed, and the universe expands at the same speed, heat-carrying light could not reach the universe's boundaries quickly enough, resulting in a significantly different measurable density of the known universe.

    According to the inflation theory, the universe was small for long enough to become homogenous, before spontaneously exploding and rapidly expanding. This explanation requires some strange and unusual conditions to exist at some point in the past and then suddenly disappear.

    According to the variable light theory, the speed of our universe's expansion became constant, but, thanks to light being much faster, heat energy became dispersed evenly. This theory removes the problematic strange conditions, yet still must be put to the test using technology that is not yet available.



    NASA Asks Public to Help Solve Its Space S**t Problem
    Orbital Junk: Art Project Aims to 'Watch, Adopt and Listen to Space Debris'
    British Scientists Develop a 3D Metal Printer That Works in Space
    Space X Rockets to Propel First-Ever US Survey of Ocean Surfaces
    theory, variable, speed of light, Big Bang theory, United Kingdom, Canada, Universe
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment

    All comments

    • Mike Vieira
      About time! Scientists have been so afraid of questioning Einstein that they couldn't create anything meaningful. Hopefully more scientists will poke around Einstein's theories the way he poked around Newton's theories and we might just accomplish something great one day.
    • Mystic-One
      This has been known for quite a long time. Russia should study the effect of gravity on light. It can align photon's, bend waves and alter the speed of light.
    • avatar
      interesting paper and conversation referred to in the fb comments.
    • supportin reply toMike Vieira(Show commentHide comment)
      Mike Vieira, that is a very well-taken double entendre for the opening of your post. Thanks for the smile. Indeed this problem is all about time.

      While nothing in relativistic physics undermines classical physics theory (indeed, it reinforces it), IMO without sorting out how Riemannian reference frames select through associative theory which outside frames as co-active and interactive partners in a compound motion through spacetime, all Eisntein has created is a brickwall against which physicists have been bashing their heads for over 90 years.

      One of the problems is that there is no mathematics of simultaneity, none of selective association and cause-to-effect validation--how do we know we are not tracking contiguous but totally unrelated parallel phenomena when we track relativistic events?--nor even a theory of equilibrium within the framework of relativistic physics though we have had one for classsical mechanics since the days of Sadi-Carnot's efficiency calcs' invention, without which latter not even our cars' engines would turn over in the morning :)

      Generalized solutions to multi-variable quadratic equations is just the start, a humble portal to a huge unexplored area of defining the metrics of physical phenomena. No one has come up with a proper refutation or proof of Kant's synthetic a priori yet and that dates back to the 18th century.
    Show new comments (0)