By clicking on the "Accept & Close" button, you provide your explicit consent to the processing of your data to achieve the above goal.
The technology used in “killer robots” is not advanced enough to ensure that the autonomous weapons make the right evaluative decisions at all circumstances, required by law, thus the weapons systems must be banned, a speaker on international law at a Geneva conference told Sputnik.
MOSCOW (Sputnik), Anastasia Levchenko – On Monday, more than 40 experts from the UN's Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) started a marathon meeting at the United Nations in Geneva to debate questions concerning Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS), or "killer robots," to determine whether LAWS should be allowed in certain capacities or banned altogether.
On Friday, the last day of the CCW conference, one of the conference speakers told Sputnik:
“There are many complicated prohibitions and restrictions on the use of certain weapon technologies, but there is no rule specifically dealing with autonomy in attack. However, if you are taking the human being out of attack decision making, then when a state is undertaking one of these weapons reviews, the question the reviewing state will need to pose is whether this system is capable of being used in compliance with targeting law.”
The targeting law includes requirements for precautions to be taken in attacks, the prohibition of indiscriminate attacks and the proportionality rule. The speaker stressed that a machine is highly unlikely to successfully distinguish between a peaceful civilian and a member of the armed forces 100 percent of the time.
The speaker underscored that “killer robots” are bound to fail the state weapon review required by article 36 of Additional Protocol I:
“What I was trying to explain to them in the CCW Conference is that the targeting law involves the whole series of evaluative decisions, which at the moment the current level of autonomous technology is not capable of undertaking.”
On Tuesday, Thomas Nash, one of the participants in the Geneva conference on LAWS told Sputnik that the United States, the United Kingdom, France and Israel appear to be opposing a ban on fully autonomous weapons, despite an array of safety and ethical concerns that “killer robots” have raised.
LAWS, or “killer robots” are defined as weapon systems designed and built to select and fire upon targets without human intervention.
Steve Goose, Director of the Arms Division at the Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Co-founder of the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots, told Sputnik on Wednesday that LAWS are unlikely to comply with the basic requirements of international humanitarian law or international human rights law, which demand human judgment in making combat attack decisions.
The fact of registration and authorization of users on Sputnik websites via users’ account or accounts on social networks indicates acceptance of these rules.
Users are obliged abide by national and international laws. Users are obliged to speak respectfully to the other participants in the discussion, readers and individuals referenced in the posts.
The websites’ administration has the right to delete comments made in languages other than the language of the majority of the websites’ content.
In all language versions of the sputniknews.com websites any comments posted can be edited.
A user comment will be deleted if it:
does not correspond with the subject of the post;
promotes hatred and discrimination on racial, ethnic, sexual, religious or social basis or violates the rights of minorities;
violates the rights of minors, causing them harm in any form, including moral damage;
contains ideas of extremist nature or calls for other illegal activities;
contains insults, threats to other users, individuals or specific organizations, denigrates dignity or undermines business reputations;
contains insults or messages expressing disrespect to Sputnik;
violates privacy, distributes personal data of third parties without their consent or violates privacy of correspondence;
describes or references scenes of violence, cruelty to animals;
contains information about methods of suicide, incites to commit suicide;
pursues commercial objectives, contains improper advertising, unlawful political advertisement or links to other online resources containing such information;
promotes products or services of third parties without proper authorization;
contains offensive language or profanity and its derivatives, as well as hints of the use of lexical items falling within this definition;
contains spam, advertises spamming, mass mailing services and promotes get-rich-quick schemes;
promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;
contains links to viruses and malicious software;
is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");
“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;
violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");
doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.
The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.