13:32 GMT +305 December 2016
Live
    Two Belgian F-16 fighter jets. (File)

    US Central Command Dismisses Claims of Belgian Airstrike on Northern Aleppo

    © AP Photo/ Geert Vanden Wijngaert
    Middle East
    Get short URL
    1950314

    The US-led coalition against the Islamic State has seen no evidence of alleged airstrikes by Belgian F-16 fighter jets in northern Aleppo, US Central Command (CENTCOM) spokesperson told Sputnik on Wednesday.

    WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — On Tuesday, the Russian military said that Belgian Air Force F-16s were suspected of killing at least six in an airstrike on the northern Syrian village of Hassajek.

    "Contrary to what Russian media reported, there is no evidence of this incident, nor were any Belgian aircraft conducting kinetic operations at the time," the spokesperson said. "Our Coalition aircrews go through a rigorous targeting process to ensure any airstrike is precise and mitigates risk to civilians."

    Belgian Defense Minister Steven Vandeput dismissed the allegations.

    On Wednesday, the Russian Foreign Ministry called on the US-led counterterrorist coalition to condemn the deadly airstrike.

    The US-led coalition of more than 60 nations has been conducting airstrikes against the Islamic State, which is outlawed in many countries, such as Russia and the United States, in Syria and Iraq since 2014.

    Related:

    All Conditions to Evacuate Civilians, Injured From Eastern Aleppo Created
    NATO Ops Caught in Aleppo is West's Worry
    Humanitarian Pause Not Enough for ‘Meaningful End' to Aleppo Bombing - UK Envoy
    Tags:
    airstrike, US Central Command, Syria, Aleppo
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment

    All comments

    • raptorabz
      Russia's mistake, they should have the S300/400 armed and ready to shoot anything flying that does not belong to Syria or Russia.. There is something very strange with the Russians , it's been a few times they have let the US and coalition forces get away. WHY???
    Show new comments (0)

    Top stories