15:00 GMT +323 October 2016
    The delegation of the High Negotiations Committee (HNC) and U.N. mediator Staffan de Mistura are seen at the start of a meeting during Syria peace talks at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, in this March 17, 2016 file photo

    Ex-EU Advisor: Syria Talks in Geneva 'Certain to Fail'

    © REUTERS/ Denis Balibouse/Files
    Middle East
    Get short URL

    Former European Union advisor Paolo von Schirach claims that Staffan De Mistura’s peace program looks certain to fail because of the gap between the Syrian government and the main opposition parties.

    WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — UN Special Envoy to Syria Staffan De Mistura’s peace program looks certain to fail because of the gap between the Syrian government and the main opposition parties, former European Union advisor Paolo von Schirach told Sputnik.

    "If the success of the Geneva Syria peace talks is based mostly on UN Envoy De Mistura's powers of persuasion, this is an utter waste of time," Schirach said on Friday. "The proximity talks that he is conducting will go absolutely nowhere."

    In the proximity talks in Geneva, the Syrian government and opposition delegations both negotiate separately with de Mistura, but never talk directly to each other, Schirach pointed out.

    "The Syrian government and the High Negotiating Committee, the broad coalition of Syrian opposition forces backed by the Saudis, cannot agree on absolutely anything of substance. In fact the only success of the talks is that they are ongoing," he argued.

    The five-year Syrian conflict, which has cost the lives of a quarter of a million people, remained a "zero-sum" struggle that could only be ended by the clear victory of one side over the other, Schirach maintained.

    "The only way to end this conflict is for one of the key parties to admit, explicitly or implicitly, that they lost; and that therefore they are willing to accept whatever crumbs they are offered, and that they will agree to call this deal a ‘reasonable solution’," he insisted.

    Because of the success of Russia’s airstrikes in support of the Syrian army, incumbent President Bashar Assad was now certain to emerge as the victor from the conflict, Schirach maintained.

    "Like it or not, given the balance of forces on the ground, and Putin's open-ended support for Assad, the rebels have to admit defeat. With its direct military intervention a few months ago, Russia has made it clear that it will not allow Assad to sink and be defeated," he said.

    By contrast, the rebel opposition forces fighting Assad lacked a strong and consistent supply of weapons and equipment they needed, Schirach observed.

    "The Saudi-backed rebels, fragmented and disunited as they are, cannot count upon unconditional military and financial support from their Arab sponsors. And by now, they should have understood that the United States will not step in to change the situation on the ground," he pointed out.

    The rebels needed to recognize "the writing on the wall" and realize that they had no way to impose their political solutions to the ongoing civil war, Schirach concluded.

    Paolo von Schirach is a Professor of International Relations at BAU International University in Washington, DC, and publisher and editor of the Schirach Report.

    One in Two Russians Support Military Return to Syria If Peace Talks Fail
    Syrian Opposition’s Preconditions Stand in Way of Peace Talks - Lavrov
    Mogherini Says Realizes EU Responsible for Bringing Peace to Syria
    Syrian peace talks, United Nations, Staffan de Mistura, Syria
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment

    All comments

    • cast235
      This guy is a sold PIG. he knows the honest truth. Syria wasn't going to fall on any opposition hands. It was going to fall on DAESH , ISIL hands. And the DAMASCUS carnage that would had follow, would had sent terror to the dark ages. With piles of bodies littering around, and women and kids, R..P'D all over .
      Only a PIG HEAD think that Russia , not Putin like hey think, would had allow THAT. That was Obama's , Mc Cain , E.U thought. Maybe tossing them to live it would had been appropriate.

      Iyt may fail. But it was to fail. What Kerry is trying to figure out is if Russia will react if Syria invaded like Iraq.
    • cast235
      Beside what I said, why U.N talking with a SAUDI team? because of teh name? the HNC? Really? They NOT Syrians and definitely the terrorists. Geneva was a platform, NOT for talks with U.N, but where the parties could seat by themselves and talk.
      They are talking, Opposition IS talking with Damascus. The Syrian forces are accepting those that wish to join and forget the past 5 years.

      But why U.S in there? When it was U.S that started all this mess with allies and friends.

      When Russia wake up, prepare for a few trillions a year on loans. And when the world begin to wake up, prepare for even worst. Unilateral sanctions. Sanctions with a smile.
    • michael
      since when do any 'talks' depend solely on one person's powers of persuasion?
    Show new comments (0)
    Top stories