06:09 GMT +325 October 2016
    The grave of murdered ex-KGB agent Alexander Litvinenko is seen at Highgate Cemetery in London, Britain

    Litvinenko Worth More Dead Than Alive

    © REUTERS/ Toby Melville
    Get short URL
    Finian Cunningham

    So now Russian President is a cold-blooded assassin, as well as Europe’s “new Hitler”, the saboteur of civilian airliners, sponsor of drug abuse in sports and the friend of Middle East butcher-dictators.

    Can the list of demonic epithets for the Russian leader get any longer? Just when you think it couldn’t, the good old British master of dirty tricks pulls out the “evil assassin” card.

    Putin is fingered for ordering the murder of Alexander Litvinenko, a former member of Russia’s security service FSB.

    The British so-called public inquiry published this week only said Putin “probably” ordered the killing of Litvinenko in London nearly 10 years ago. But the intended innuendo implanted in the public mind is plain: Putin is an assassin.

    As the Russian Foreign Ministry said in derisory response to the British report, it is all so predictable. The politicization of a criminal matter is so flagrantly transparent, it is almost cringe-making in its clumsiness.

    The inquiry was ordered by the British government in October 2014, and is anything but “public”. It is based on secret evidence presented behind closed doors by anonymous British intelligence figures.

    No verifiable proof worthy of a proper legal court is presented. It is based entirely on “circumstantial”, that is subjective, inference by a former British judge sitting in private, but who is then given ample media exposure to broadcast his “findings”. To call this a “judicial ruling” is a farce and an insult to the public’s intelligence.

    Yet following the announcement of the inquiry’s “conclusions”, the British government immediately censured Russia over “a blatant and unacceptable breach of international law”. This is not only typical British arrogance, it is a dangerous, reckless misuse of a country’s dubious legal procedures to project an international political jurisdiction.

    There is plenty of hard evidence for Russia or any other state to accuse the British prime minister of war crimes given his country’s illegal interference in Libya and Syria. But what gives Britain the right to accuse Russia’s head of state of murder, especially based on such flimsy “circumstantial” evidence? Britain’s disrespect for international norms in this regard is a new low in dirty tricks.

    The corny Cold War stereotypes of “ex-KGB spies seeking revenge” is the first giveaway that this is a “psyops job”, in addition to the scripted political reaction by the British government. This latest smear fits consistently with the long-running running Western-led propaganda vendetta against Vladimir Putin.

    As alluded to above, the smears include Putin wanting to militarily over-run Europe to revive the Soviet Empire, to the shooting down of the Malaysian MH17 airliner over eastern Ukraine in July 2014 with 298 dead, to Russia’s air force support for Syrian President Bashar Assad. Even though the latter instance is legitimate aid to an allied country which is actually being attacked by Western-backed terrorist mercenaries for regime change.

    Of the many absurdities in the British report on the death of Litvinenko, perhaps the main one is the alleged use of radioactive Polonium as a lethal poison. Two named former FSB agents are accused in the British report of having tipped the toxin into Litvinenko’s pot of tea during a private meeting at a posh London hotel. How very English. Death by a cup of tea!

    The meeting did take place in November 2006. Three weeks later, Litvinenko died in a London hospital from internal organ failure apparently due to poisoning from the Polonium.

    But if, as the British claim, it was the work of cold-blooded, professional Russian assassins under orders from their bosses in the Kremlin the fatal contradiction in this claim is that the apparent murder was carried out with extraordinary amateurishness.

    Traces of radioactive polonium were allegedly found in the London hotels where the accused Russian men stayed and even the planes they travelled on. If professional assassins were to use radioactive poison they would keep the lethal dose in a lead capsule to prevent emission of radioactivity. Our putative Russian assassins in London must have been throwing the deadly substance around themselves like aftershave, if we are to believe the findings of the British judge.

    On the contrary, what careless radioactive traces in hotels, planes and elsewhere strongly suggest is that someone was laying an incriminating path to frame up the Russian men. And even at that we don’t really know if traces of radioactivity were actually found because, as noted the un-public nature of the British inquiry was based entirely on secret, unverifiable “evidence”.

    This is the same kind of legal “standard” that the West uses to accuse Russian warplanes of bombing hospitals in Syria or Russian tanks rolling across Ukraine – with no verifiable evidence. It’s all down to politicized assertion and bombast.

    Litvinenko defected from Russia to Britain in 2000 after he was sacked from the Russian FSB for unprofessional misconduct. He became a British citizen and worked for Britain’s state intelligence MI6. It sounds as if Litvinenko was an expedient opportunist, making nice money as an anti-Putin media writer, from which he was able to buy a fashionable house in London.

    He was a valuable asset to the British owing to the very public allegations he made and they were able to broadcast for smearing Putin and other Russian government officials with corruption claims. As a former “Kremlin spy”, the propaganda value that the British state exploited through Litvinenko was considerable.

    But then came an even more valuable propaganda opportunity for the British – Litvinenko’s death.

    Who is to say that his British handlers did not bump off the Russian “former spy” with their own supply of radioactive polonium? And given Litvinenko’s personal umbrage with the Russian government for being sacked from the FSB, he could be relied on by the British to give a plausible-sounding death bed statement imputing Putin for his demise.

    The putative scenario of Litvinenko’s alleged assassination by Russian agents under the direction of the Kremlin was like an investment for the British. The propaganda dividends have paid out since his death in 2006 with recurring media stories impugning Vladimir Putin.

    The timing of the latest big dividend – actually openly accusing Putin of ordering assassination – is another cause for suspicion that the British “public inquiry” is just the latest twist in a long-running smear campaign.

    British media are calling for more sanctions to be imposed on the Russian government and for extradition warrants to be issued. However, British officials are quoted as saying that they are constrained because of the “sensitive timing” in relation to the peace talks due to take place in Geneva next week over Syria.

    “We have other fish to fry with the Russians,” said one official in explaining why the British authorities may not take more legal action against Moscow over the Litvinenko case.

    The “other fish to fry” is a veiled reference to extracting concessions from Russia over Syria where the British objective is regime change against President Assad.

    This has all the hallmarks of a time-honored British psychological operation. Pile up the smears to then undermine the moral authority of your opponent in order that concessions can be extracted.

    For the British, Alexander Litvinenko is definitely worth more dead than alive.

    The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Sputnik.

    Cameron: Report Confirms UK's Belief Litvinenko's Death 'State Sponsored'
    London Talks Tough After Litvinenko Inquiry, Freezes Chief Suspects' Assets
    investigation, polonium-210, Alexander Litvinenko, Russia, Britain
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment

    All comments

    • ptcjm
      well this is in accordance with the elite of the British empire established way of using corpses for different means, like they did some century ago; making book covers from the skin of the ceased and further for special items covered with the skin from women's genitals; very soft and delicate to touch. And as for that........the Russian assassins have a lot to learn: not to waste anything.
    • Trump 2016
      A cheap traitor bought by MI5 for a measly £2k per month??! Is a fool like this worth any Government to pull off a polonium stunt in Central London, with the death to follow AFTER TWO WEEKS of adverse publicity?!? Surely Putin has more brain than that ! The only winner here is Carlsberg, who can tell the punters "probably" means their lager is the best now, owen must be a gay freemason to be used so easily.
    • terryjohnodgers
      The British establishment is now into persecuting their own citizens who stand up to speak out of turn (Tommy Robinson) so anything that is broadcast as a finding from them must be taken with a grain of salt.

      One must also look at the Western agenda that is in place to demonize the Russian President and for what purpose does it serve.

      The Ukraine and Syria did not occur because of stupid thinking. They occurred because of an agenda that the Western establishment elite have been pushing since the assassination of President Kennedy.
    • Ann
      What these repeated attacks on Mr. Putin have done, is consolidated the hearts and minds of Americans for him. We recognize the demonization tactic - we are all too familiar with it. This just encourages us to believe in Mr. Putin even more. You see. WE KNOW our government courts terrorists and demonizes decent people whose only crime is thwarting their war plans. When you combine these ridiculous attacks with what we SEE Putin doing, with our own eyes, the trash gets NO traction with us.

      We believe not a word. In fact, if they don't stop soon, there may come a day that the media and these governments render themselves altogether irrelevant.
    • Ann in reply toTrump 2016(Show commentHide comment)
      WW3 is here, In American parlance, "probably" means it's a lie. If there was even a perceptible smidgen of truth in any part of it - the media would just come right out and indict him in the media. That's a fact. So these maybe, possibly, kinda sorta adverbs tell us all we need to know.

      PUTIN IS OUR HERO - Go Russia!
    • gbiyanju
      Let this continue until a real Nuremberg, that condemns and metes out appropriate punishment (capital included) to the Western leaders - no off limit areas, like was done to covert their tracks to Hitler results from the defeat of the West.
    • jj42
      This will not derail Russia's plans and objectives every trick the west tries backfires on them our prime minister Cameron is a war criminal along with Obama and the rest.
    • earlw35
      This guy's own father didn't think to highly of him, worth dead than alive obviously the British wanted him dead more.
    • Ivan Zadorozhny
      There are more plausible theories about Litvinenko’s death. That the UK gov’t inquiry had to push the most far-fetched and the least credible one speaks volumes. Anyway, the report’s inconclusive fingering of Putin pretty much amounts to a clean bill of health for the Russian president given the origin and circumstances of the report.
    • poeg11
      Funny how people who fear reprisal from criminals go into witness protection and relocation whereas those fearing the same from Russia's intelligence services go to tea...
    • Mother Gorilla
      The British and the Americans behind them are being punished by huge storms as we read. They are not on any moral ground committing false flags, bombings and assassinations weekly if not daily and then blaming others for them.
    • Ingimundarin reply topoeg11(Show commentHide comment)
      poeg11, Witness protection? There's no such thing. American "witness protection" is a bed of lye in an unmarked grave. Use your head.
    • gsimms81
      Yassar Arafat's body was exhumed about a year ago and traces of radioactive polonium was found so Putin must have ordered his assassination? Greedy traitor's like Litvinenko make enemies fast and his assassin could have been any number of people, including the Israeli Mossad.....
      The Oligarch's will do anything to bash Vlad the Great.....
    • wbeeby
      Boris Beresovsky and Alexander Gplsfarb both heavily implicated but not even mentioned.
    Show new comments (0)
    Top stories