03:44 GMT01 December 2020
Listen Live
    Business
    Get short URL
    2247
    Subscribe

    The Russian Transport Ministry intends to sign an agreement with China on building a high-speed railway between the Russian cities of Moscow and Kazan.

    SHANGHAI (Sputnik) — The Russian Transport Ministry hopes to reach an intergovernmental agreement with China in 2016 on the construction of a high-speed railway between the Russian cities of Moscow and Kazan, Russian Transport Minister Maxim Sokolov said Tuesday.

    "The first part of this project is already being actively implemented… Last year, a corresponding memorandum was signed between the two ministries, the Russian and Chinese railways, and I hope that this year we will reach an intergovernmental agreement," Sokolov said at the International Conference Railway Business at Transit Speed.

    China has recently confirmed plans to provide a 400 billion-ruble ($6 billion) loan for Russia's Moscow-Kazan High-Speed Rail Project, as well as equity financing of 52 billion rubles and an additional $1 billion.

    Moscow–Kazan High-Speed Rail Project was first proposed by First Vice-President of Russian Railways Alexander Misharin in 2009, arguing that the project will spur innovation and increase population mobility. In 2013, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the decision to go ahead with the project.

    China expressed initial interest in 2014, proposing for the project to become the initial stage of connecting Moscow and Beijing, with a view to extending it further into Europe, eventually reaching London.

    Related:

    China to Take Part in Constructing High-Speed Rail Line in Western US
    China Plans Strategic High-Speed Rail to Nepal Through Mount Everest
    Company Head: Russian Railways Discussing High-Speed Rail Network With China, EU
    Chinese Companies Ready to Invest $10.8Bln in Moscow-Kazan High-Speed Rail Project
    Tags:
    high-speed railway, Russian Transport Ministry, Maxim Sokolov, China, Moscow, Russia, Kazan
    Community standardsDiscussion