09:24 GMT +314 November 2019
Listen Live
    Railway policemen stand guard at a railway station following high alert in Ahmadabad, Gujarat state, India, Sunday, March 6, 2016

    After Three Presidential Rejections, Indian State Passes Controversial Anti-Terror Law

    © AP Photo / Ajit Solanki
    Asia & Pacific
    Get short URL

    New Delhi (Sputnik): Two key features of the anti-terror law -- intercepted telephone conversations and admissibility of confession made before a police officer investigating a case -– will now be considered as evidence.

    Having thrice failed to get presidential assent previously, a controversial anti-terror bill by the government in the Indian state of Gujarat was declared law on Tuesday by the region’s legislative assembly.

    Originally known as the Gujarat Control of Organised Crime (GUJCOC) Bill 2004, the proposed legislation was renamed the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime (GCTOC) Bill 2015.

    The new law retains a provision of empowering police to tap telephone conversations and submit them in court as evidence. Confessions made in the presence of police are now admissible in court and the probe period has been extended from 90 to 180 days before the filing of a charge sheet.

    Before the bill was declared law, the Gujarat's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) faced stiff resistance in the legislature from the opposition Congress party over several provisions. The opposition eventually walked out of the assembly.

    The bill has been criticised by social activists who said it has "dangerous implications". The state government, however, justified it by claiming that current penal and procedural laws are inadequate to deal with organised crime.

    It may be recalled that former Indian president A.P.J. Abdul Kalam had once objected to Section 14 of the Bill (telephone interception as evidence) in 2004 and returned it to the state government to remove the clause.

    On Tuesday, the bill was again introduced by Gujarat's Deputy Home Minister Rajnikant Patel, who said that its provisions favour the nation and allow law enforcement to take action against "traitors".


    Islamabad Denies India's Claim That it Destroyed 'Terror Camps' in Pakistan-Administered Kashmir
    India-Bangladesh T20 Match In Delhi, Despite Polluted Air, Terror Threats, Pleas For Location Change
    Terror Threat Looms Large over South India as NIA Continues Searches in Daesh Recruitment
    opposition, Congress, Bharatiya Janata party (BJP), admission, court, evidence, anti-terror law, Gujarat, India
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik