To improve the performance of our website, show the most relevant news products and targeted advertising, we collect technical impersonal information about you, including through the tools of our partners. You can find a detailed description of how we use your data in our Privacy Policy. For a detailed description of the technologies, please see the Cookie and Automatic Logging Policy.
By clicking on the "Accept & Close" button, you provide your explicit consent to the processing of your data to achieve the above goal.
You can withdraw your consent using the method specified in the Privacy Policy.
In a recent interview for French media, former French Ambassador to Russia Jean de Gliniasty stated that Crimea has always been Russian, arguing that the Ukraine conflict could have been avoided if Kiev had offered guarantees to protect the Russian language on the peninsula, and transferred control of the port city of Sevastopol to Russia.
In the interview, published in France's Le Figaro on Sunday, Gliniasty, who served as France's Ambassador to Russia between 2009 and 2013, noted that France and Europe had committed grave diplomatic errors with respect to policy over Ukraine which could have been avoided. The former ambassador angrily noted that as a result of this erroneous policy, his "five years of work…have been wasted."
"This [the Ukrainian crisis] was not a difficult issue to solve," Gliniasty explained. "We should have simply transferred control of Sevastopol to Russia, and guaranteed the status of the Russian language in Crimea." The former ambassador argued that the official transfer of the port city, home to the Russian Black Sea Fleet, should have occurred no later than 2042, when Russia's lease agreement with Kiev for the naval base expired. "These projects could have been formulated at the moment when Moscow began to voice its objections to the signing of the Association Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine," Gliniasty noted.
Unfortunately, in the former ambassador's view, these proposals were never realized, "hindered by a lack of knowledge of history on the EU's part, and especially by US actions." Gliniasty noted that ultimately, Europe had found itself "in the hands of the US." He also placed part of the blame for Kiev's repeated violations of the ceasefire in Donbass on Washington, noting that Ukraine is in danger of becoming one of the 'favorite playgrounds' of American diplomacy, which is aimed at blocking Russia in the post-Soviet space.
When asked why Europe should have agreed to transfer Sevastopol to Russia and call on Kiev to guarantee the status of the Russian language on the Crimean peninsula, Gliniasty stated that "Crimea has never belonged to Ukraine; it has always been Russian."
The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.
Your account has been deleted! You can restore your account within 30 days by following the link sent to the e-mail address you entered during registration.
The fact of registration and authorization of users on Sputnik websites via users’ account or accounts on social networks indicates acceptance of these rules.
Users are obliged abide by national and international laws. Users are obliged to speak respectfully to the other participants in the discussion, readers and individuals referenced in the posts.
The websites’ administration has the right to delete comments made in languages other than the language of the majority of the websites’ content.
In all language versions of the sputniknews.com websites any comments posted can be edited.
A user comment will be deleted if it:
does not correspond with the subject of the post;
promotes hatred and discrimination on racial, ethnic, sexual, religious or social basis or violates the rights of minorities;
violates the rights of minors, causing them harm in any form, including moral damage;
contains ideas of extremist nature or calls for other illegal activities;
contains insults, threats to other users, individuals or specific organizations, denigrates dignity or undermines business reputations;
contains insults or messages expressing disrespect to Sputnik;
violates privacy, distributes personal data of third parties without their consent or violates privacy of correspondence;
describes or references scenes of violence, cruelty to animals;
contains information about methods of suicide, incites to commit suicide;
pursues commercial objectives, contains improper advertising, unlawful political advertisement or links to other online resources containing such information;
promotes products or services of third parties without proper authorization;
contains offensive language or profanity and its derivatives, as well as hints of the use of lexical items falling within this definition;
contains spam, advertises spamming, mass mailing services and promotes get-rich-quick schemes;
promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;
contains links to viruses and malicious software;
is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");
“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;
violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");
doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.
The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.
Users can initiate the recovery of their account / unlock access by contacting the moderators at moderator@sputniknews.com
The letter must contain:
Subject - the restoration of account / unlock access
User ID
An explanation of the actions which were in violation of the rules above and resulted in the lock.
If the moderators deem it possible to restore the account / unlock access, it will be done.
In the case of repeated violations of the rules above resulting in a second block of a user’s account, access cannot be restored.
All comments
Show new comments (0)
in reply to(Show commentHide comment)