Macron, Hamon Should Quit Race After Backing US Syria Strikes - French Official

The support by two French presidential candidates Emanuel Macron and Benoit Hamon of the US military strikes in Syria is an irresponsible fact and should be the reason for their disqualification from the presidential race, the spokesman for right-wing French presidential candidate Nicolas Dupont-Aignan told Sputnik.

MOSCOW (Sputnik) — The US attack against a Syrian military airfield launched by President Donald Trump late last Thursday triggered criticism among such French presidential hopefuls as National Front (FN) party leader Marine Le Pen, leader of left-wing political movement Unsubmissive France Jean-Luc Melenchon and the president of Gaullist Arise France party Dupont-Aignan. Socialist Hamon and independent candidate Macron, on the other hand, have expressed their support for the US president's action.

"Having criticized Trump before and after the election, [German Chancellor Angela] Merkel and [French President Francois] Hollande have approved of this attack, which is [Trump’s] most serious and most dangerous decision on the global scale. They have shown themselves to be completely irresponsible. The same applies to certain candidates at French presidential elections, like Hamon and Macron, the two former ministers of the socialist president. Their reaction is enough to disqualify them from assuming the office they seek, I believe," Eric Anceau said.

Following the missile strikes, which killed seven people, according to the governor of Syria's Homs province, Hollande in a joint statement with Merkel placed the blame for the latest developments in Syria on its President Bashar Assad, albeit without providing any evidence of his involvement in the attack.

According to Anceau, Trump's hasty reaction to the chemical weapons incident is undoubtedly the most dangerous decision he has made since assuming office.

"When one is the head of the most powerful state in the world, one does not make decisions based on emotions, as he admitted to have done after having seen on TV all these dead bodies of children," he said, adding that the Trump administration should have consulted the US Congress first.

"In his haste, he circumvented the US Congress, which, incidentally, says a lot about the state of the US democracy in particular and our democracies in general," the spokesman added.

He underlined that unless the strike had an ulterior motive, such as "a desire to affirm one's power" in regions where other world powers like Russia or Iran are present, Trump's decision to strike Syria lacks logic.

Following the strikes, Dupont-Aignan, who according to recent polls enjoys support of some 3 percent of French voters, told the French daily Le Monde that the international community had no proof Assad ordered the chemical attack, and because of this, Trump had no reason to order the strike. At the same time, he pointed out that he would back a UN-led intervention in Syria if it is proved that the Syrian government was indeed responsible for the Idlib tragedy.

The Syrian government denied having chemical weapons, as it agreed for its entire stockpile to be destroyed under a 2013 US-Russian deal. The Organization for the Protection of Chemical Weapons confirmed in January 2016 that Syria’s chemical weapons arsenal was destroyed.