OPCW Report on Syria Chemical Weapon Incident Lacks Clarification

© AP Photo / Alfonso PerezThe Executive Council of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has condemned any use of chemical weapons, referring specifically to the OPCW Fact-Finding Mission findings
The Executive Council of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has condemned any use of chemical weapons, referring specifically to the OPCW Fact-Finding Mission findings - Sputnik International
Russian envoy to the OPCW Alexander Shulgin said that the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons' (OPCW) recently released report on the results of the probe into the suspected chemical weapons attack in Khan Sheikhoun in Syria’s Idlib province does not provide answers to several important issues.

Russian Foreign Ministry building - Sputnik International
OPCW's Syrian Sarin Gas Report Based on Doubtful Data - Russian Foreign Ministry
MOSCOW (Sputnik) — The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons' (OPCW) recently released report on the results of the probe into the suspected chemical weapons attack in Khan Sheikhoun in Syria’s Idlib province does not provide answers to several important issues, Russian envoy to the OPCW Alexander Shulgin said Friday.

Earlier in the day, the OPCW said that its fact-finding mission had established the use of sarin, a gas used as a chemical weapon, in the April 4 Idlib incident.

"We are sure that the report leaves a lot of important questions without answers … We saw the photos [from the site of the incident] were the medics could be seen. They were working without any protective gear. We asked how could it happen that the doctors were working in such conditions without protective equipment and somehow were not infected. But there is no answer in the released report. There is no explanation," Shulgin told the RT broadcaster.

The envoy underlined that Russia had repeatedly urged the OPCW mission to conduct investigations on the ground in the Idlib province. However, despite this being the logical course of action, the organization preferred to work remotely.

Shulgin also stressed that the report’s authors failed to identify the type of weapons that were used in the incident and locate the exact place where the attack happened.

"They failed to locate the site, where the attack was made. They did not have any access to the hospitals, where the injured were treated," the Russian envoy noted.

Th envoy concluded by saying that Moscow's firmly stands by its stance that the results in the report are based on questionable data that was provided by the Syrian opposition and by the infamous White Helmets group.

OPCW Says Sent Report on April Sarin Use in Syria to UN Security Council
On April 4, the National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces, supported by the United States, blamed Damascus for the Khan Sheikhoun incident that killed 80 people, including children, and injured 200 more. The Syrian army strongly rejected the accusations and laid the blame on local militants and their patrons. The Syrian authorities said that they had never used chemical weapons against civilians or terrorists, and that the nation's entire chemical arsenal had been destroyed under the control of the OPCW.

Reacting to the incident, Washington, which had not presented any proof of chemical weapon use by Damascus, launched 59 cruise missiles at the Syrian governmental military airfield in Ash Sha’irat on April 7.

On April 21, Assad told Sputnik that there was no chemical weapon attack in Idlib, adding that the reports of it were a false flag and fabrication which was supposed to justify a US missile strike on the Syrian airbase.

To participate in the discussion
log in or register
Заголовок открываемого материала