15:50 GMT +317 August 2019
Listen Live
    This is a June 15, 2016 file photo of of traffic crossing the border between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland in the village of Bridgend, Co Donegal Ireland.

    New Report Reignites Concerns Around Irish Backstop Plan

    © AP Photo / Brian Lawless
    World
    Get short URL
    0 0 0

    In line with the deal agreed between the Brussels and London in November 2018 – a deal voted down three times in the House of Commons - all of the UK would remain in a de facto customs union with the EU until a trade and security agreement has been installed to safeguard against a hard border between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.

    A new report, commissioned by the German Green Party and seen by The Guardian, is set to rekindle concerns in Berlin over the current wording of the Brexit withdrawal agreement.

    READ MORE: PM May's Job Safe Until December, Promises To Provide EU Departure “Clarity”

    The Irish backstop plan in its present form could reportedly undermine the EU’s green and social standards while still keeping UK access to the European single market.

    Those behind the report claim the current Irish backstop is nothing short of a brilliant deception devised by UK negotiators to allow a future British prime minister to undermine the EU’s green and social standards while retaining access to the European single market.

    Once the backstop would be in place, the customs territory would “include the corresponding level playing field commitments and appropriate enforcement mechanisms to ensure fair competition between the EU27 and the UK”, to prevent Britain from diverting from EU standards on environmental or social protection, says the current deal.

    READ MORE: Brexit Backstop is Actually Where EU Wants us — English Democrats Chair

    Despite the withdrawal agreement specifically stating that Britain must not undermine European standards for social and environmental protection – such as those stipulated by working-hour directives or emissions targets – it omits to say how the UK should ensure compliance with these standards.

    “The bitter reality for the EU is that the UK negotiated successfully in their interest to lower standards, limit freedom of movement but keep de facto market access”, said Franziska Brantner, a Green MP who commissioned the report.

    READ MORE: Tommy Robinson Announces He Is Running to Be MEP, Slams Brexit Party’s Farage

    Authors of the report claim a future, possibly more rash, government in London could theoretically allow companies to self-regulate.

    The new German report, seen by The Guardian, accordingly warns that the flawed wording of the deal means that the EU will find it impossible to stop a more forceful Boris Johnson or a Jacob Rees-Mogg from breaking with these standards and yet continuing to export British products into the single market.

    READ MORE: EU Keeps Info on Second Brexit Referendum Talks With Soros and Blair SECRET

    The report, which suggests tightening the wording around social and environmental standards at the future relationship stage, will most likely reawaken concerns about the deal, understood to be shared across the political spectrum.

    Related:

    Brexit Backstop is Actually Where EU Wants us - English Democrats Chair
    Scotland Referendum Ultimatum Unlikely to Sway Brexit Negotiations - Author
    Brexit Party MEP Race to Include Opera Singer, News Pundit, Danish Dentist
    Their Entire Position Starts From Deceit - Campaigner on Tories' Brexit Handling
    Brexit
    Tags:
    backstop solution, Irish border, EU, single market access, Brexit, standards, withdrawal, Brexit, House of Commons, Jacob Rees-Mogg, Boris Johnson, Theresa May, United Kingdom
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik