14:42 GMT +322 October 2019
Listen Live
    Jordan Peterson

    Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek Clash in Intellectual 'Duel of Century'

    CC BY-SA 2.0 / Gage Skidmore / Jordan Peterson
    World
    Get short URL
    173
    Subscribe

    The much-anticipated debate was arranged after Canadian self-help guru Jordan Peterson reacted to an article titled “Why do people find Jordan Peterson so convincing?” by Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek, in which he chastised the professor’s views.

    For over two hours, viewers were glued to the screens to see Canadian clinical psychologist and best-selling author Jordan Peterson verbally clash with Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek while debating “Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism” at Toronto’s Sony Centre on Friday.

    READ MORE: Jordan Peterson REVEALS What Makes Him 'Very Unpopular'

    Speaking in front of the sold-out crowd, Peterson opened the intellectual debate night by admitting that he had failed to study all the works by Zizek, who has written three books on Marxism; instead he re-read he called the “original cause of all the trouble” – German philosopher Karl Marx’s  “Communist Manifesto”.

    The Canadian professor namely focused on the notion that owners of the means of production were evil, while workers were inherently good, adding that Marx failed to take into account other factors driving the class struggle.

    “It’s absolutely foolish that you can make an assumption about someone’s moral worth by their economic standing”, he said.

    While acknowledging that capitalism generates inequality, he stressed that it also produces wealth.

    “The rich may be getting richer, but the poor are getting richer, too. The poor are not getting poorer under capitalism; the poor are getting richer under capitalism”, Peterson said to a round of applause.

    As Zizek took the stage, he described their debate as the “duel of the century” and said that they both were “marginalised by the official academic community and supposed to defend here the left liberal line against neo-conservatism”.

    “Happiness is a confused notion. The worst thing that can happen is for us to get what we officially desire”, Zizek said, adding that people, in fact, don’t want what they think they do.

    The Slovenian professor then said that the global market is regulated in ways that serve some countries while exploiting others, and pointed out the “evils” posed by unrestrained capitalism.

    READ MORE: Twitter Erupts as AI Algorithm Makes Jordan Peterson Rap Like Eminem

    As the debate went on, people stormed social media platforms with all sorts of reactions and memes, with many saying that unlike Peterson, Zizek didn't refer to the Communist Manifesto at all:

    Many supported Peterson, saying that he seemed to know more about Marxism than Zizek, who has written several books on the matter:

    Peterson, a best-selling University of Toronto clinical psychologist, and Zizek, a Slovenian Hegelian-Marxist critical theorist, the two being intellectual internet celebrities, decided to schedule a debate on the fabric of society after Zizek penned an article for The Independent entitled “Why do people find Jordan Peterson so convincing?” in February 2018.

    READ MORE: LISTEN as Jordan Peterson AI Model SLAYS Eminem's 'Rap God'

    In response, Peterson challenged Zizek on Twitter, and even though the Slovenian is not on the social media platform, he accepted the challenge.

    Related:

    LISTEN as Jordan Peterson AI Model SLAYS Eminem's 'Rap God'
    Twitter Erupts as AI Algorithm Makes Jordan Peterson Rap Like Eminem
    Fans Rejoice as Jordan Peterson's Book Returns to Shelves in New Zealand
    Twitter at Odds After UK Actor Reveals He is 'a Big Fan of Jordan Peterson'
    Twitter Balks at Retailer’s Jordan Peterson Book Ban After NZ Mosques Massacre
    Tags:
    psychologists, memes, marxism, happiness, philosophy, capitalism, professor, challenge, Jordan Peterson, Karl Marx, Canada
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik