14:53 GMT16 May 2021
Listen Live
    Get short URL

    The German Foreign Ministry previously made it clear that the country advocated for the preservation of the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty after US President Donald Trump announced that Washington would withdraw from the agreement over alleged violations by Russia.

    German parties, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), Christian Social Union (CSU) and Social Democratic Party (SPD), will put the United States’ envisaged withdrawal from the INF treaty with Russia high on the agenda at a Tuesday meeting of the coalition committee.

    READ MORE: EU Hoping INF Treaty May Still Be Salvaged — Mogherini

    In an interview with the German-language daily newspaper Märkische Allgemeine Zeitung, Rolf Mützenich, a member of the SPD, warned that Washington’s unilateral decision may lead to the deployment of US intermediate-range missiles on German soil.

    Even if the treaty falls apart, “Germany must not become the venue of nuclear war games. We will not agree to the deployment of new US medium-range missiles,” Mützenich stressed.

    The MP elaborated that “we must do everything we can to ensure that thinking in nuclear categories does not return.”

    “There is no military gap between the US and Russia, as some claim again and again,” he said.

    Speaking at a conference in Germany last week, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that the bloc had no plans to deploy new missiles in Europe:

    “NATO has no intention to deploy new nuclear missiles in Europe. But as an Alliance, we are committed to the safety and the security of all Allies. We must not allow arms control treaties to be violated with impunity. Because that undermines the trust in arms control in general. So we call on Russia to ensure compliance, and to return to constructive dialogue with the United States.”

    Stoltenberg’s comments came shortly after US National Security Adviser John Bolton told reporters that Washington had no intention to deploy “INF non-compliant missiles in Europe in the foreseeable future.”

    In October, US President Donald Trump announced that Washington sought to pull out from the INF Treaty, citing alleged violations by Russia. Moscow rejected the accusations, emphasising that Russia would be forced to take action to ensure its security if the agreements was terminated by Washington.

    The INF Treaty, inked in 1987 by the United States and the Soviet Union, banned both countries from possessing, producing or flight-testing ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 km and their launchers.


    EU Hoping INF Treaty May Still Be Salvaged - Mogherini
    Putin Says Russia 'Will Certainly Respond' to US Withdrawal From INF Treaty
    EU Urges US to Assess Impact of Pullout From INF Treaty on European Security
    US Has No Plans to Place New INF Non-Compliant Missiles in Europe - Bolton
    UK Gov't Opens Parliamentary Inquiry Into US Withdrawal From INF Treaty
    Russia, Europe Concerned About Unclear Future of INF Treaty - Kremlin
    Putin, Trump May Discuss INF Treaty During Brief Meeting in Paris - Source
    Russia Hopes to Restore Full-Fledged Negotiations With US on INF Treaty - Putin
    US Did Not Discuss Planned INF Treaty Pullout With Chinese Officials - Pompeo
    INF Treaty 'Serves Rather Than Hampers' US Interests - Top Ex-Military Officers
    German FM Explains Why INF Treaty Doesn't Guarantee Safety Even if Preserved
    WATCH US Test Intercept of Missile Banned by INF Before Formally Exiting Treaty
    Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF), withdrawal, agreement, treaty, war games, nuclear, missile, INF, party, coalition, Social-Democratic Party (SDP), CSU, Christian Social Union (CSU), Christian Democratic Union (CDU), CDU, NATO, Jens Stoltenberg, Donald Trump, Germany, Soviet Union, US, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion