03:14 GMT27 November 2020
Listen Live
    Get short URL
    Year in Review: Highlights of 2016 (25)
    0 44

    The biggest data leak ever, a trove of 11.5 million files, which shook the world in 2016, offering a glimpse into conspiracies, scandals, frauds and iffy offshore accounts of billionaires and celebrities, as well as 12 current and former global leaders, began with a stranger popping a question to the German Sueddeutsche Zeitung newspaper.

    MOSCOW (Sputnik) The fallout so far has included several investigations launched across the world, a prime minister resigning, a famous lost painting rediscovered and one country's reputation tarnished.

    In early April 2016, an unprecedented leak of millions of files obtained by Sueddeutsche Zeitung from an anonymous source came to light triggering a huge offshore scandal with the repercussions still being felt even eight months later.

    John Doe, the anonymous source behind the leak whose identity remains unknown, provided the German journalists with 2.6 terabytes of inside data from Mossack Fonseca, a Panamanian law firm specializing in the creation of shell corporations.

    No newsroom could cope with this vast amount of information alone: simply making it searchable presented a challenge. Sueddeutsche Zeitung turned to the US-based International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) for help as the organization had already coordinated similar investigations in the past. The project eventually grew to include more than 400 journalists from around 80 countries.

    It took approximately a year of locked rooms, secret conversations and hard work to scan the documents, transform them into a searchable archive, sift through all the information and put together numerous stories, some of them more damning than the others.

    According to ICIJ, the information connects more than 214,000 offshore companies to people from more than 200 countries. The data was not published in its entirety and it was not given to the official prosecutors.

    It has to be said that an offshore company is not illegal in and of itself, but it may be used to cover up activities of a varying degree of legitimacy. A shell company does not make a man who set it up or profits from it a criminal, and neither does the simple mention in Panama Papers. A large part of the giant cache of the documents shows people simply managing their money well within the legal boundaries. Sometimes, however, shell companies do serve to cover up questionable decisions or breaches of law.

    Year in Review: Highlights of 2016 (25)


    London Remains Capital of Corrupt Elite Despite Panama Papers Probe
    US Destroyer Zumwalt Returning to California Port After Panama Mishap
    EU Commissioner Faces Questions Over Panama Papers Scandal
    Panama Papers, data leaks
    Community standardsDiscussion