17:08 GMT +323 March 2017
    Dawn at Caspian Sea

    Tehran's 'Big Lake' Claim Muddies the Waters in Caspian Sea Dispute

    © Sputnik/ Said Tsarnaev
    Get short URL

    The unique features of the Caspian Sea has dogged decades of negotiations on the status of the body of water, political scientist Vladimir Sazhin told Sputnik Persian.

    This week the 47th Session of the Special Working Group (SWG) on the development of the Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea met in Tehran, where deputy foreign ministers of the Caspian states discussed a possible agreement on the Caspian's legal status.

    Since 1991, the five Caspian Sea countries have made agreements on a range of areas including the environment, the protection of marine resources, security, co-operation in the case of emergency situations and military activities in the lake.

    In practice, they have come to agreement regarding the division of the water surface into zones of exploitation. According to this agreement, the five Caspian countries have the right to exploit marine resources up to 25 miles from their coast. This includes 15 nautical miles which constitutes national waters, plus another ten nautical miles in which each state has the exclusive right to fishing. The rest of the water is considered international.

    Political analyst Vladimir Sazhin told Sputnik Persian that while the Caspian Sea countries have made a lot of progress on the issue, a final Convention is still far from being agreed.

    "I will say straightaway that for the moment the prospect is extremely remote. At the moment the legal framework for the Caspian Sea is based on two agreements signed by Iran and the Soviet Union in 1921 and 1940," Sazhin said.

    "Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, three new littoral states established after the collapse of the Soviet Union, do not recognize these agreements and are holding discussions about the future status of the sea."

    "Of course, this is justified because after all there are now five, not two independent Caspian states, each of which has an equal right to this sea-lake, on the basis of their geographical location," Sazhin explained.

    The issue of whether the Caspian Sea, the Earth's largest enclosed body of water, is actually a lake or a sea is at the core of many of the disagreements, since a lake comes under the jurisdiction of the states along its shore, and not international law.

    Iran is convinced that the Caspian is a lake, and its waters and resources should be divided equally five ways. This would give Tehran control over 20 percent of the water and sea bed.

    Bilateral treaties signed between Iran and the USSR also recognized the sea as a lake, giving the two countries the right to divide its resources equally between them.

    However, Iran's four neighbors in the Caspian now say that, as reflected by its name, the body of water is really a sea. Therefore, they argue, the water and sea bed should be divided according to a modified median line. 

    A median line runs at an equal distance from the states' acknowledged coastlines. A modified median line enables some flexibility in cases where sub-sea resources have already been developed, or a field found by one country spills over the median line.

    Russia and Kazakhstan were the first to sign an agreement delineating the sea according to this principle in 1998, and signed a trilateral agreement with Azerbaijan in 2003. In 2004 Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan also signed an agrement to define their territorial waters, which came into effect last year.

    However, the proposal is rejected by Tehran since its Exclusive Economic Zone would constitute only 13 percent of the sea according to this principle, roughly the same zone it controlled during the Soviet Union, and continues to exploit today.

    Azerbaijan to the west of Iran and Turkmenistan to the east reject in turn Tehran's idea, since it would deprive them of some territorial water and resources.

    Other issues to be resolved around the Caspian Sea include navigation, underwater communications and transit, including oil pipelines. 

    Despite the stumbling blocks, all parties are actively engaged in discussions to resolve these issues. Five sessions of the SWG have been held this year alone, one in each country's capital city.


    Russian Shipyard May Construct Drilling Rigs for Oil Projects in Caspian Sea
    Russian Ships Mastering Defense at Black, Caspian Seas
    Over Two Dozen Russian Black Sea, Caspian Ships Sail Out as Part of Snap Check
    seabed, sea, disputed territory, Kazakhstan, Russia, Caspian Sea, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment

    All comments

    • avatar
      A lake is a lake, big or small. A lake is a body of water that is not connected to an ocean, and the Caspian is just that i.e. a lake. Who can deny it?
    • avatar
      wonderful how people fight over terms.
    • avatar
      What should be pushed is a CANAL. A BIG canal so Russian warships DO NOT depend ONLY on E.U ..Because Turkey is E.U. Thinking they will get something big. Wait till debts hit the nose like all other E.U states. They trying to turn E.U in a union A LA U.S. Presidents will become governors, and countries states. Just doing deals , trade with E.u FORCES you to sign E.U laws and accept them. A CHARLATAN way , and signed by world TRAITORS. If everyone refuse, they have to go laughing with all conditions removed or collapse near overnight.

      Russia needs alt routes. Thru sea and land. Trains that could transport them FAST. Going thru Iran is a GREAT way.
      Then get Iran into SCO. The more countries the best to form a military and economic coalition. And E.U model. Add BRICS. And there it goes.
      Russia should move FAST, before elections. Russia should had taken RAQQA LONG ago.
    Show new comments (0)