21:20 GMT29 March 2020
Listen Live
    World
    Get short URL
    151910
    Subscribe

    The new US Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act is vindictive, and ultimately harms the United States' strategic partnership with Saudi Arabia, Abdul-khaleq Abdullah, Emirati Gulf specialist and professor of political science at United Arab Emirates University, told Sputnik.

    In an interview with Sputnik, Abdul-khaleq Abdullah, Emirati Gulf specialist and professor of political science at United Arab Emirates University, slammed the revived US 9/11 bill as nothing but a "greedy law" which he said rides roughshod over the United States' interests.

    The interview came after the US Congress overwhelmingly voted to overturn President Barack Obama's veto of the new bill, which allows the families of the victims of the September 11 attacks to sue Saudi officials for their alleged involvement in the attacks.

    This is the first time the US Congress has blocked a presidential veto during Obama's time in office. Now the controversial bill, called the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, will become a law.

    "This is a very nasty and vindictive law that is targeting many countries, but mostly Saudi Arabia," Abdul-khaleq Abdullah said.

    He made it plain that this law will most likely weigh heavily on the financial aspects of the relationship between the United States and Saudi Arabia.

    "This is a greedy law in the sense that it really targets billions of dollars of Saudi Arabian investment in the United States," he said, adding that Riyadh is almost certain to react by reconsidering its US investment policy.

    Also, given that many see the bill as a sign that an anti-Saudi Arabian campaign is in full swing in the United States, we can expect a scaling down of Riyadh's cooperation with Washington on many issues, including those related to fight against terrorism, according to him.

    " So this is a bad law both for Saudi Arabia and the United States, and this document is not aimed at addressing grievances of relatives of 9/11 victims," Abdul-khaleq Abdullah added.

    He said that the law may finally lead to Saudi Arabia totally reviewing its 70-year special relationship with the United States, including issues pertaining to the use of petrodollars and the countries' military partnership.

    Following the Wednesday vote, White House spokesman Josh Earnest called the Congressional decision the most embarrassing thing US lawmakers have done in several decades.

    Earlier this week, the White House argued that the bill could create a dangerous precedent, and that other countries could be allowed to sue the United States for its actions abroad.

    The Obama administration's justification is unsurprising, given that according to the whistleblowing site The Intercept, "organizations such as the Long War Journal, the New America Foundation, and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism estimate that at least 200 and as many as 1,000 civilians have been killed by American drone strikes in nations where the US is not at war since Obama took office."

    US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter also voiced his concerns in a separate letter.

    He said that placing US interests in the hands of foreign courts could put national security at risk. Congressional lawmakers in their turn insist that the bill could allow the families of victims to seek justice and closure for the atrocities that occurred in 2001.

    Related:

    Saudi Arabia Slams US Law Allowing 9/11 Victims to File Lawsuits Against It
    US Arms Saudi Arabia Despite 'Radicalization' Fears
    US Public Must Know if 9/11 Leads to Saudi Arabia in 28 Pages Pursued
    US House Approves Bill Allowing 9/11 Victims' Families to Sue Saudi Arabia
    Tags:
    relationship, investments, interests, law, bill, 9/11, United States, Saudi Arabia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via SputnikComment via Facebook