By clicking on the "Accept & Close" button, you provide your explicit consent to the processing of your data to achieve the above goal.
MOSCOW, December 30 (Sputnik) — A former Australian member of parliament Gary Johns was severely criticized by the country's human rights and welfare organizations for his proposal to ban the provision of financial aid to people not on forced contraception, newspaper The Guardian reported Tuesday.
"What it is is welfare bashing. We don't acknowledge that the government has a responsibility to all people," former social justice commissioner Tom Calma was quoted as saying Tuesday by the newspaper. He added that depriving people of their right to reproduction was a "slippery slope."
Australian National Council for Single Mothers and their Children head Therese Edwards agreed that former parliamentarian Gary Johns' proposal was "draconian," noting that his position was "born out of ignorance." She also questioned the way the contraception would be administered, The Guardian reported.
In an article published in The Australian on Tuesday, Johns suggested that people receiving welfare should be placed on forced contraception, citing several examples of troubled families that he said should have fever children. If people of low income choose to have children, they should assume the responsibility on their own or wait until the moment they will be able to afford it, John stated. He also noted that the decision might affect Aboriginal and Islander people who are not used to using birth control.
Gary Johns represented the Australian Labor Party in the country's parliament from 1987 to 1996. After his defeat in 1996, he left parliament and has since become critical of his former party. At present, Johns is a writer and the columnist for The Australian.
The fact of registration and authorization of users on Sputnik websites via users’ account or accounts on social networks indicates acceptance of these rules.
Users are obliged abide by national and international laws. Users are obliged to speak respectfully to the other participants in the discussion, readers and individuals referenced in the posts.
The websites’ administration has the right to delete comments made in languages other than the language of the majority of the websites’ content.
In all language versions of the sputniknews.com websites any comments posted can be edited.
A user comment will be deleted if it:
does not correspond with the subject of the post;
promotes hatred and discrimination on racial, ethnic, sexual, religious or social basis or violates the rights of minorities;
violates the rights of minors, causing them harm in any form, including moral damage;
contains ideas of extremist nature or calls for other illegal activities;
contains insults, threats to other users, individuals or specific organizations, denigrates dignity or undermines business reputations;
contains insults or messages expressing disrespect to Sputnik;
violates privacy, distributes personal data of third parties without their consent or violates privacy of correspondence;
describes or references scenes of violence, cruelty to animals;
contains information about methods of suicide, incites to commit suicide;
pursues commercial objectives, contains improper advertising, unlawful political advertisement or links to other online resources containing such information;
promotes products or services of third parties without proper authorization;
contains offensive language or profanity and its derivatives, as well as hints of the use of lexical items falling within this definition;
contains spam, advertises spamming, mass mailing services and promotes get-rich-quick schemes;
promotes the use of narcotic / psychotropic substances, provides information on their production and use;
contains links to viruses and malicious software;
is part of an organized action involving large volumes of comments with identical or similar content ("flash mob");
“floods” the discussion thread with a large number of incoherent or irrelevant messages;
violates etiquette, exhibiting any form of aggressive, humiliating or abusive behavior ("trolling");
doesn’t follow standard rules of the English language, for example, is typed fully or mostly in capital letters or isn’t broken down into sentences.
The administration has the right to block a user’s access to the page or delete a user’s account without notice if the user is in violation of these rules or if behavior indicating said violation is detected.