07:04 GMT12 July 2020
Listen Live
    Get short URL
    0 03

    New Delhi (Sputnik): A senator in Pakistan has left people on social media in splits after mistakenly tagging the UNO card game instead of the UN while trying to tweet something on Kashmir.

    Rehman Malik, the former interior minister of Pakistan and chairman of the Senate Standing Committee, recently shared a tweet quoting Indian opposition leader Ghulam Nabi Azad to cite the situation in Kashmir.  Little did he realise that he was actually tagging the UNO card game. 

    Just as the twitterati noticed the Pakistani minister making such a mistake, social media trolls went berserk.

    A big section of netizens heavily trolled Malik, some of them even asking whether he would next consider bringing the game of “Monopoly” into the Kashmir issue.

    UNO happens to be a card game where players match colours and numbers and the one who ends up with the least amount of cards in the end wins.

    Malik, a vociferous critic of the Narendra Modi-led government, often takes to social media to take a dig at the Indian government’s policies.

    He has been a well-known critic of the Indian administration on every other issue, especially since the government of India revoked the special status of Jammu and Kashmir.

    India's move caused a diplomatic row with Pakistan and in response, Islamabad expelled New Delhi's envoy to the country, besides suspending trade and communication links.

    India views its decision as an internal matter, while Pakistan recently approached the UN, claiming that the decision violates UN declarations and the Simla Agreement signed between the two countries in 1972.


    Pakistani Minister Objects to Twitter Writing to President Alvi Over Kashmir
    India’s Governing BJP Set to Launch Campaign to Ramp up Support for Gov’t’s Kashmir Decision
    It's Time to Decisively Act on Kashmir - Pakistani PM
    Trump Butts Out: India, Pakistan Able Find Amicable Resolution to Kashmir Issue
    India, United Nation, Pakistan
    Community standardsDiscussion