19:55 GMT +323 March 2019
Listen Live
    Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks during the Book Expo event in New York Thursday, June 1, 2017

    US DOJ Told FBI to Ignore ‘Gross Negligence’ in Clinton Investigation - Report

    © AP Photo / Craig Ruttle
    US
    Get short URL
    158

    This demand effectively made prosecution of Hillary Clinton over the email scandal impossible, a report citing private congressional interviews says.

    The US Department of Justice reportedly instructed FBI not to use "gross negligence" as a reason to prosecute former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over her private email server scandal, a report by The Epoch Times revealed.

    The report quotes testimonies by FBI agents — including notorious lawyer Lisa Page and FBI Counterintelligence Division Assistant Director Bill Priestap, who was in charge of the Clinton investigation — before lawmakers which took place behind closed doors in 2018.

    According to Page's testimony, the DOJ effectively dictated every step of the investigation to the FBI. The only step the FBI took on its own was the famous statement by FBI Director James Comey, who exonerated Clinton on the email scandal on 5 July 2016.

    "Everybody talks about this as if this was the FBI investigation, and the truth of the matter is there was not a single step, other than the July 5th statement, there was not a single investigative step that we did not do in consultation with or at the direction of the Justice Department," Page told congressional investigators on 13 July 2018.

    According to the report, an unknown employee in the FBI general counsel's office sent an email to Priestap's former boss, Michael Steinbach, which included a list of "available statutes for prosecuting the former Secretary of State." The email explicitly excluded "gross negligence" from the list, with a comment that read "DOJ not willing to charge this."

    Gross negligence is a statute that, unlike many others, does not require proof of malicious intent to be grounds for prosecution. According to The Epoch Times report, however, the DOJ made it clear it wanted the FBI to prove intent in Clinton's actions, effectively making her prosecution impossible.

    "The Department of Justice made a decision that intent was required, even though we have a statute on the books that does not require intent, that [only] requires gross negligence," then-House Majority Counsel Ryan Breitenbach reportedly summarized during the hearings.

    Curiously, that exact statute of "gross negligence" was used as a justification for a search warrant to gather information in the Clinton investigation. When asked about the inconsistency by Breitenbach, Priestap replied that he did not know who sent the email in question or why the "not willing" comment was included in the memo.

    "Absent a slip-up on her part, Clinton was effectively in the clear from the outset of the FBI investigation due to the DOJ's decision to require intent," the report reads.

    The Epoch Times notes that, with a few exceptions, every person mentioned in the report has been fired or has resigned. Most of those people have been subjected to congressional interviews.

    Related:

    Plot Thickens: Analyst on Clinton, Alleged FBI Quid Pro Quo and Trump 'Ouster'
    Hillary Clinton Evokes 'Blackface' Comments Over 2019 Virginia Election Tweet
    Haley, Chelsea Clinton Fume at Rep. Ilhan Omar's Remarks on Israeli Lobby in US
    Hillary Clinton Mocked Online for Claiming There's No Emergency at US Border
    Hillary Clinton Has High Hopes for Ousting Maduro Peacefully
    Tags:
    Email Scandal, obstruction of justice, Investigation, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), US Department of Justice, Hillary Clinton, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik