15:51 GMT +330 March 2017
    Retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn arrives at the Trump Tower (File)

    The Trump Team's First Loss: Who Was Behind Flynn's Resignation

    © AFP 2017/ Eduardo Munoz Alvarez
    Get short URL

    The main reason for the resignation of the US President's National Security Adviser Michael Flynn is to be found in the deep differences within the American establishment, RT quoted experts as saying.

    RT cited an array of experts as saying that the resignation of the US President's National Security Adviser Michael Flynn could be caused by the deep differences between members of the American establishment.

    On Monday, the White House announced that Michael Flynn had resigned from the post of US President Donald Trump's National Security Adviser and that retired Lieutenant General Keith Kellog had been appointed to take his place.

    In his resignation letter, Flynn said that he had not provided the White House with full information about his contacts with Russian Ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak.

    Flynn's phone communications with Kislyak prior to Trump's inauguration on January 20 have raised questions about whether the adviser broke a law forbidding private US citizens from engaging in diplomatic disputes with foreign nations.

    National Security Adviser Michael Flynn sits in the front row before the start of the President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe joint new conference in the East Room of the White House, in Washington, Friday, Feb. 10, 2017
    © AP Photo/ Carolyn Kaster
    National Security Adviser Michael Flynn sits in the front row before the start of the President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe joint new conference in the East Room of the White House, in Washington, Friday, Feb. 10, 2017

    Former Pentagon official Michael Maloof said that accusations that Flynn allegedly violated this law hold no water.

    "The matter is that we do not know exactly what Flynn discussed with Kislyak during a telephone conversation. They want to accuse Flynn of breaking the so-called Logan Act of 1799, which has never been applied in the judicial practice. This is madness!" Maloof was quoted by RT as saying.

    Russian political analyst Viktor Olevich, for his part, told RT that certain members of the American establishment wanted to benefit from the scandal around Flynn.

    "The scandal was advantageous to those in the US establishment and the US legislature, who tried to force the Trump Administration to adhere to the foreign policy that is beneficial to the American political establishment, and not to drastically alter the current relations between Washington and Moscow", Olevich told RT. 

    Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn (File)
    © AP Photo/ Drew Angerer / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA
    He added that "this resignation shows some weakness of the new US Administration" and that "in this case, Trump and his team were not willing to use political leverage to defend their position."

    Olevich was echoed by Pavel Podlesny from the Moscow-based Institute for US and Canadian Studies, who said Flynn's resignation is the result of internal conflicts within the new US Administration.

    "The Trump Administration includes a whole array of people with different views who have never met before. So there may be some mutual friction and disagreements caused by any plausible pretext," he said.

    Podlesny added that the 1799 Logan Act was used in order to drive another wedge between the United States and Russia and complicate the work of the new US Administration.

    "Yes, Flynn called the Russian Ambassador in Washington, but these were not formal negotiations. This was a pretext to remove the man who called for the improvement of Washington's relations with Russia," he pointed out.

    Michael Maloof, for his part, said that the resignation of Michael Flynn is an unfortunate development, and something that can be called a victory for the Democrats.

    "This is a victory of [the US] mainstream media and the Democrats. They dislike the current Administration so they will do their best to prove its unreliability. This is just the beginning," he said.

    He recalled that  from the very beginning, the US elite wereopposed to Flynn's nomination and the fact that Flynn appeared on RT as a political analyst only added fuel to the fire.

    Meanwhile, the US political journalism website Washington Free Beacon has reported that members of the former US Administration allegedly conducted "a secret, months-long campaign" to discredit Michael Flynn.

    The Washington Free Beacon referred to "multiple sources in and out of the White House who described… a behind-the-scenes effort by these officials to plant a series of damaging stories about Flynn in the national media."

    "The operation primarily focused on discrediting Flynn, an opponent of the Iran nuclear deal, in order to handicap the Trump Administration's efforts to disclose secret details of the nuclear deal with Iran that had been long hidden by the Obama administration," the Washington Free Beacon said.

    The website, in particular, quoted one senior White House official as saying that leaks targeting Flynn were "not the result of a series of random events."

    The Washington Free Beacon also cited a congressional adviser as saying that "the Obama Administration knew that Flynn was going to release the secret documents around the Iran deal, which would blow up their myth that it was a good deal that rolled back Iran," and that "in December the Obama NSC started going to work with their favorite reporters, selectively leaking damaging and incomplete information about Flynn."

    Never miss a story again — sign up to our Telegram channel and we'll keep you up to speed!


    Flynn Denies Discussing the Lifting of Anti-Russian Sanctions With Russia
    Obama Administration Supporters Led Secret Campaign to Discredit Flynn
    Defense Secretary Mattis Says Flynn's Resignation Has No Impact on Pentagon
    WikiLeaks Wants to Make Contents of Flynn's Talks With Russian Ambassador Public
    disagreements, establishment, negotiations, scandal, victory, resignation, media, Michael Flynn, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment

    All comments

    • avatar
      Well if Mr. Flynn has broken a law it is not up to me to justify !!!
      But in many country's around the world there are laws more older then the Usa !!!
      All the governments around the World should clean up Law Books !!! or adjust !!!
      The World is every day changing faster and faster... Laws from 1799 maeby not more up to date and should be adjust or canceled !!! and not more in the law's books !!!
      for ex sample In the Netherlands in the "Heineken crime case" the Prosecute was set chess mate by the defense layer with a Law from the year +/- 1800 !!! The kidnappers got free and the many was never Found ( 10.000.000 millions) !!!
      Bravo for the defending Layers !!! But I feel as normal person very sick about the Law !!!
    • Mikhas
      Trump blinked with Flynn, perhaps in a vain hope that it would suffice to please the deep state and the ziocon armageddonists but no such luck unfortunately, they will be taking his administration down one by one and for all their "Russia did this and that" brouhaha: The WW3 is on despite US illusions about a "crippling first strike" and the €urofag vassals praising the "superiority" of their master are more than happy to go first.
    • The Night Wind
      Although I realize that nobody trusts the US Government anymore, I think that in this case we should simply take Trump at his word: He felt distrustful of Flynn. Only a short time ago, Trump fired Flynn's son for a breach of protocol. Despite what the Corporate Media and DNC want to believe, Flynn's resignation does NOT signal the impending downfall of the Union.
    • Is it because I am black?
      Clearly, they are trying to blame Flynn for the intended war with Iran that has not gone down well with the public.
      Yet, one warmonger less won't make that much of a difference. You wonder why Americans bother to elect presidents at all, given that they all have to do what the MIC wants.
      With Obama you could still have said, a weak black man who can't stand up to the white establishment.
      But what excuse do Trump and his Trumpists have?
    • avatar
      Antares Prime
      Word is being put out over the media by certain top military brass that Mad Dog Mattis will at some point resign out of disagreement with President Trump. He couldn't say that unless Mattis was already hovering on the edge of opposition already.

      It's feeling more and more like banana republic politics at the highest levels. The central core is empty here.
    Show new comments (0)