13:47 GMT +327 March 2017
    A pair of traders confer at a phone post on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Thursday, Jan. 3, 2008

    Wall Street Traders 'Should Have Been Jailed' For 2008 Financial Crisis

    © AP Photo/ Richard Drew
    Get short URL

    Alibaba founder Jack Ma has made a legitimate criticism of US politics, which failed to distribute huge amounts of wealth or penalize Wall Street traders for their role in the 2008 financial crash, lawyer Harley Lewin told Radio Sputnik.

    On Wednesday Alibaba founder Jack Ma blamed US politics for creating the discontent that led to Donald Trump's election victory. 

    He backed globalization, and criticized poor distribution of wealth in the US over the past 30 years. He said that the US government has spent too much money waging war abroad, and failed to spend money on ordinary people and infrastructure.

    Harley Lewin, partner at McCarter & English law firm, told Radio Sputnik that the issue of money spent fighting foreign wars is a debatable issue, but the failure to penalize Wall Street for traders' role in bringing about the 2008 financial crisis is more black and white.

    "Do I think the US should play a leadership role in trying to defeat terrorism after 9/11? Absolutely, and I think you take it to them, I don't think you wait until they take it to you. So it's a complex set of circumstances," Lewin said. 

    "We've fought wars, and I would never say that we shouldn't have been there. But when you look at the economic complexity of what goes on on Wall Street, virtually nobody has gone to jail from the 2008 catastrophe, in my view they should have. They continue to work almost in an unimpeded fashion. I think we need jobs in the US, I think some of the policies of the US in terms of trade have resulted in a loss of jobs, but I don't think that's the way you fix the future," Lewin said.

    Donald Trump has promised to create more jobs in the US by following a protectionist policy that threatens to put higher tariffs on goods produced outside the US. He has also criticized US military expenditure on the NATO alliance and on the defense of allies in the Far East such as Japan.

    Despite that, several of Trump's Cabinet nominations have a military background, which could see him give the military a high priority, Lewin said.

    "He has certainly focused, during the past year, on US domestic rather than foreign policy. I have no reason to believe that that will not continue. I have every reason to believe that his idea of domestic growth and enhancing jobs is his number one priority," Lewin said.

    "The effect on the military situation I think is quite different. He has appointed a number of generals to his cabinet, they have a military background, he appears at least to like them and like that type of individual. I think that that is very difficult to read. Generals are raised in the military idea of thinking, which is not necessary global, political thinking, and they're being asked to play political roles now. Whether that will result in a diminution of US policies in terms of the military presence abroad, it's very hard to say at this point."

    Speaking at the Davos World Economic Forum, Jack Ma said that poor politics rather than globalization is to blame for the ills of social inequality and unemployment in the US. 

    Outsourcing jobs to China or Mexico, something criticized by Trump, is actually "wonderful" and "perfect," for the US economy, allowing American companies to make a lot of money. According to Ma, the real problem comes later, when the spoils are not equally shared by the government.

    "American multinational companies made millions and millions of dollars from globalization," Ma said. "The past 30 years, IBM, Cisco, Microsoft, they've made tens of millions — the profits they've made are much more than the four Chinese banks put together…But where did the money go?"

    Instead of investing in infrastructure and ordinary people, the US has spent $14.2 trillion on 13 wars in the past 30 years.

    "What if they spent part of that money on building up the infrastructure? Helping the white collars and blue collars? No matter how strategically good it is, you're supposed to spend money on your own people. We should spend money on people who are not good at schooling."

    In addition, the government allowed its focus to turn from manufacturing to Silicon Valley and Wall Street.

    "When I was young I heard America is about Ford and Boeing, those big manufacturing companies. The last 10 to 20 years, I heard about is Silicon Valley and Wall Street. The money goes to Wall Street. What happened? Year 2008. The financial crisis wiped out $19.2 trillion in the US alone … What if the money (had been) spent on the Midwest of the US developing the industry there?" 

    "It's not (that) the other countries steal jobs from you guys — it is your strategy," Ma told the forum.


    Russia, Beware of Trump U-Turns
    Belgrade Breathes Easier As Trump's Win Marks End to Clinton-Era Interventionism
    Global Oil Market Re-Balancing Quicker Than Expected – Saudi Energy Minister
    Women’s Marches In Solidarity With Washington DC Spread Globally
    economic globalization, globalization, manufacturing, politics, Jack Ma, Donald Trump, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment

    All comments

    • avatar
      Walter Wolf
      Chinese gov would definitely execute few thousand of officials and businessman if such injustice happened to China.
    • support
      There is no statute of limitations for crimes of fraud committed on that scale. File a complaint with the US Justice Department with info backing the allegations and they can take it from there.

      The real problem is that no one has filed a complaint yet. The online criminal activity complaint forms for the Anti-Trust Division and the SEC and the CFTC are all online.

      Pull the trigger or go home, Jack.

      You do not even need to be a US citizen to file this type of criminal complaint.
    • avatar
      As well as those that profitted greatly from it like Warren Buffet!
    • supportin reply toWalter Wolf(Show commentHide comment)
      Walter Wolf, a better punishment would be for them to work as fry cooks at MacDonald's for three years, or working for LaboReady doing construction site cleanup while sleeping nights at the local homeless shelter.
    • avatar
      traders should be jailed full stop.
    • MaDarby
      Why are Chinese billionaires any different from US ones? Jack Ma get his money from the CPC which gives him all he needs to engorge himself. He enjoys the same corrupt privileges he pays for that US billionaires "lobby" to get. Inequity is growing rapidly in China just as it has in every other capitalist system. Capitalism can only do one thing - concentrate wealth. I'd like to know what his tax is compared to what Bezos pays over at Amazon which is nothing more than a token amount. if he competes with Amazon he is surly not paying any more tax than they are, something the CPC is clearly down with.

      Globalization by China is just as harmful to our communities than US globalization.

      The "Great powers" are too great and too powerful and should be broken up. (Sorry Mao)
    • avatar
      stiil i'm wondering where is gone all that money...
    • avatar
      francescoslosselin reply toWalter Wolf(Show commentHide comment)
      Walter Wolf,
      it's quite probable, the difference is why happen only somewhere else...
    • avatar
      Absolutely, and I think you take it to them, I don't think you wait until they take it to you.
      Stupid neocon talk. Some guy trying to talk tough. That's a recipe for a permanent state of war.
    • avatar
      Harley Lewin, partner at McCarter & English law firm, told Radio Sputnik that the issue of money spent fighting foreign wars is a debatable issue,
      There's nothing debatable about war crimes in Iraq, Ukraine, Syria, Libya, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and the numerous illegal coups that the West sponsors. There is not a single thing to debate about it.
    • avatar
      This man doesn't understand the American. He understands business. Gee... look at all the wealth he has created for himself; I don't see him rushing to "distribute" it to the citizens of his country. Americans don't want to be taken care of by the government (unless you are some brainwashed useful idiot like those protesting the new US president); Americans want to provide for themselves, want to make their own way. And above all; Americans want the government to do as they are told by the people through elections, instead of going off on their own quest's to turn the world into their vision of what the world should be.
    • avatar
      Yes, they should have been jailed. I recall at the time reports of senators' and reps' phone lines crashing from furious citizens demanding the bankers be brought to heel. But the president who was unfolded from a closet dismissed our demands.

      The first of many disappointments, but his glee in destroying Libya and Syria toward the end of his presidency took my breath away in its coldness and sociopathy.
    • avatar
      Iceland has made a bit of a start... The US will NEVER do what's needed to the bankers
    Show new comments (0)