09:54 GMT +318 November 2019
Listen Live
    US Secretary of State John Kerry addresses a news conference during a NATO foreign ministers meeting at the Alliance headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, December 6, 2016.

    Kerry Refuses to Confirm 'Anonymous Reports' of Putin-Ordered Hacking

    © REUTERS / Francois Lenoir
    US
    Get short URL
    241426
    Subscribe

    Speaking at the State Department on Thursday, US Secretary of State John Kerry refused to comment on "anonymous intelligence reports" alleging that Russian President Vladimir Putin was personally involved in hacking into US election in favor of president-elect Donald Trump.

    On Wednesday evening, NBC News aired a story claiming that unnamed “senior intelligence officials” told them that Russian President Vladimir Putin was personally involved in hacking the US election. The claims have been mocked and refuted by a number of former intelligence officials, as well as Congressman Peter King, a member of the House Intelligence Committee.

    “I am not going to comment on anonymous reports from intelligence officials that are not identified that have quotes around the concept of intelligence officials,” Kerry said at the press briefing.

    Kerry also pointed to statements made by President Barack Obama in October, warning of "Russian-directed hackers" who were attempting to influence the election.

    Meanwhile at the White House, the Obama administration suggested that Putin was, in fact, personally involved — though no evidence to back up their allegations were provided.

    White House Press Secretary Josh Earnst also claimed on Thursday that it was a "fact" that hacking had helped Trump's campaign, and that he "must have known" about Russian interference as he had joked about encouraging Russia to find the 33,000 emails that Hillary Clinton had deleted from her private server.

    "A wide variety of aspects of the situation will be considered," Earnest said. President Obama and his team are set to "cast a wide net" in weighing the arguments about the truth of what happened for "formulating an effective proportional response." The 'proportionality' of the response will consider the impact of hacking, alleged interferences in the election process, and the level of sophistication by malicious agents. 

    "I would acknowledge that designing a response seems subjective," he said, adding "it is true."

    Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has dismissed the Russian hacking allegations as baseless and unfounded, while Russian President Vladimir Putin has stated that the charges are an attempt to distract American voters from domestic issues. Likewise, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has called the allegations "a hysterical election-year campaign tactic."

    Related:

    Former NSA Officer William Binney: CIA Lying About Russians Hacking DNC
    CIA Shows ‘No Single Piece of Evidence' of 'Russian Involvement' in US Election
    Former CIA Analyst: Russian Hacking Allegations of US Election Don’t Add Up
    Spy vs. Spy: DNI Refuses to Support CIA Russian Hack Claim, Citing Lack of Proof
    Trump's Showdown With the CIA
    Tags:
    Hacking, Election, Hillary Clinton, Vladimir Putin, John Kerry, Donald Trump, United States, Russia
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik