- Sputnik International
World
Get the latest news from around the world, live coverage, off-beat stories, features and analysis.

Trump Defeat of Clinton Aided by FBI Director Reopening of Email Probe - Analyst

© AFP 2023 / JIM BOURG / POOLDemocratic nominee Hillary Clinton (L) and Republican nominee Donald Trump arrive on stage during the second presidential debate at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri on October 9, 2016
Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton (L) and Republican nominee Donald Trump arrive on stage during the second presidential debate at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri on October 9, 2016 - Sputnik International
Subscribe
The head of the Federal Bureau of Investigation probably tipped the presidential election to Donald Trump by revealing a revived probe of emails possibly tied to Hillary Clinton, analyst Paolo von Schirach told Sputnik.

A woman sits on the floor behind a cut-outs of US presidential nominees Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump at an election event organised by the US embassy, at a hotel in Seoul on November 9, 2016 - Sputnik International
Clinton Blames FBI Director for Loss
WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — “Whatever his actual intentions, FBI Director [James] Comey probably helped deliver the White House to Donald Trump on a silver platter,” said Schirach, who is president of the Global Policy Institute, a think tank in Washington, DC.

In his view, Trump benefited from the October 28 letter Comey sent Congress asserting that newly found correspondence compelled the FBI to reopen an investigation of emails Clinton sent and received as US secretary of state.

The unusual communication from the FBI director to lawmakers just 11 days before the election was “presented to America by Donald Trump as clear evidence the FBI had enough incriminating evidence to send Hillary Clinton to jail for her mishandling of classified information” as secretary, Schirach asserted.

In practice, Comey was much more circumspect, according to Schirach, who said nothing in the letter justified a presumption of guilt.

“Every first-year law student in America knows that reopening an investigation is not the same as an indictment based on compelling evidence of possible criminal conduct, let alone a guilty verdict pronounced by a jury after a trial,” he said.

But the public perception and political fallout of Comey’s disclosure was significant if hard to measure, Schirach insisted.

On November 6, two days before Election Day, Comey issued another letter, stating that FBI investigators concluded no substantive new information had been found in an email cache on a computer shared by Clinton aide Huma Adedin and her estranged husband, ex-congressman Anthony Weiner.

Schirach, however, said Comey’s second letter didn’t help Clinton and may have harmed her electoral chances by fuelling fears of a cover-up.

On Saturday, according to media reports, Clinton told campaign donors on a conference call that Comey’s initial letter unnecessarily put the controversy over her past email practices back before the public, stopping the campaign’s late-stage “momentum.”

Comey has said he was required to tell Congress that new information had compelled the FBI to reopen the Clinton email investigation, Schirach observed.

“Maybe he really had to. However, the way he did contributed to weakened popular support for Hillary Clinton, [which was] not very strong to begin with,” he concluded.

Schirach, a former US Agency for International Development consultant, is also a professor of international relations at BAU International University in Washington and editor of the Schirach Report.

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала