23:56 GMT +315 July 2019
Listen Live
    Surveillance

    US Rights Groups: Give the Public Control Over Police Surveillance

    © Photo : Pixabay
    US
    Get short URL
    264

    On the heels of ongoing police killings and increased police surveillance, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has joined with 17 national civil rights and privacy organizations in 11 cities to put the power of privacy back into the hands of the community.

    Sam Sacks, host of Radio Sputnik’s Unanimous Dissent, spoke with ACLU advocacy and policy council Chad Marlow about the initiative, and about how police have the power to violate the rights of citizens without their knowledge.

    ​​


    "In almost every city in the country right now, the decision about whether or not local police forces will use surveillance technologies are made almost exclusively in secret." Marlow said. "The first step of this effort is to transfer that decision-making process from the police departments into the transparent and open public-hearing processes of city councils."

    The initiative will include Hattiesburg, Mississippi; Madison, Wisconsin; Miami Beach, Florida; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Muskegon, Michigan; Palo Alto, California; Pensacola, Florida; Richmond, Virginia; Seattle, Washington, and Washington DC. 

    Marlow explained that the issue isn’t only surveillance, but also who is being surveilled and why.

    "When we have been able to peer behind the curtain of secrecy," he said, "what we have seen is that, when these technologies are deployed, they are actually not deployed evenly, but rather are disproportionately [deployed] against communities of color, certain racial and ethnic groups, low-income communities and politically-active groups."

    "This is something we hope to change by maximizing the power of local communities to influence that l city council decision making process…so they can advocate for their interests, form strategies, and be as effective as possible in making sure that those city council votes mimic the desire of the communities which they serve," he stated. 

    Marlow described a diverse array of technologies used by police to spy on communities, including closed-circuit television cameras, automatic license-plate readers, piloted light aircraft with high-definition cameras capable of recording the comings and goings of entire cities, social media-monitoring software, and even policing software that uses data to predict crimes.

    Sacks pointed out that "It’s not just that the police are deploying these technologies without prior consultation with city leaders and with voters, it’s that they’re actively taking steps to keep these technologies a secret."

    Participating organizations include the NAACP, the Council on Arabic/Islamic relations, the Million Hoodies Movement for Justice, the Tenth Amendment Center and South Asian Americans Leading Together (SAALT).

    Related:

    NSA Data Collection 'Grace Period' Violates Constitution - ACLU Attorney
    ACLU Sues Boston Police Department
    Chicago Police, ACLU Agree to Outside Monitoring of 'Stop and Frisk'
    Chelsea Manning’s Conviction Could Harm Her Chances of Parole - ACLU
    Pentagon Publishes 200 Bush-Era Torture Pictures After ACLU Lawsuit
    Tags:
    Surveillance, American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Washington, DC, Seattle, Palo Alto, Milwaukee, Miami Beach, Richmond, VA, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik