00:58 GMT +325 February 2017
    9/11 Terror Attacks: World Trade Center

    US, International Experts to Discuss Alternative Versions of 9/11 Attacks

    © Flickr/ Cyril Attias
    Get short URL
    9/11: The worst terrorist attack in modern history (19)

    Engineers, intelligence experts and scientists plan to discuss independent versions of the World Trade Center towers’ collapse and other aspects of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, author and founder of the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth James Fetzer told Sputnik.

    WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — On Saturday, the eve of the attacks’ 15th anniversary, Fetzer has organized the second Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference. The online event will bring together ten participants from the United States and other countries.

    The participants include Scott Bennett, a former US Army intelligence and psychological-operations officer; Susan Lindauer, who describes herself as a former CIA asset; and T. Mark Hightower, a chemical engineer specializing in a class of explosives known as nano-thermites.

    Fetzer said that for the past 15 years, he has been collecting evidence that supports his contention that the US government played politics before and after the September 11 attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people.

    He also stressed that US media outlets did not sufficiently report on unofficial interpretations of the attacks.

    "From the beginning, reports about 9/11 were tightly controlled by media managers," Fetzer stated.

    In an online publication "9/11: The Who, the How, and the Why," Fetzer claims, based on his own and US military officials’ research, that the crash sites in New York City and the US states of Virginia and Pennsylvania were fabricated.

    In his latest book, "America Nuked on 9/11," Fetzer presents 28 detailed studies asserting that the CIA and the US Department of Defense had prior knowledge of the attacks but let them happen "in order to justify the transformation of U.S. foreign policy."

    According to Fetzer, planning for the attacks "appears to have originated in the fertile imagination" of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, "who wanted to find a way to draw the US into dismantling the modern Arab states that served as a counter-balance to Israel's domination of the Middle East."

    According to the US government’s official version of events, 19 hijackers, who had pledged allegiance to the al-Qaeda terror group and its leader, Osama bin Laden, intentionally crashed four jumbo jets in New York, at the Pentagon near Washington, DC, and in a Pennsylvania field.

    Investigations by US federal agencies concluded that fire was the main reason the twin towers of the World Trade Center collapsed.

    However, numerous critics have voiced disagreement that a fire — as opposed to a controlled demolition — could bring down the towers, arguing that the burning of kerosene-based jet fuel would not have been hot enough to destroy the structures that were built to withstand an airplane crash.

    9/11: The worst terrorist attack in modern history (19)


    Ex-Official: StratCom Was Waging a Made-Up Nuclear War When 9/11 Attacks Began
    US Citizens Give Up Privacy Rights After 9/11 Attacks - Advocacy Group
    US Agencies’ Culture Hinders Crisis Response After 9/11 Attacks - Ex-Fire Chief
    Never Forget? Depressing Video Shows US Millennials Mostly Clueless About 9/11
    terrorism, 9/11, James Fetzer, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik
    • Сomment

    All comments

    • Drain the swamp
      What is there to discuss, cheney was INSIDE the WHITE HOUSE issuing stand down orders to NORAD, FOR ONE WHOLE HOUR in the most restricted airspace in the world, so the plan of crashing planes would not be spoiled.
    • avatar
      Its time now to slam the "9/11-report" in the governments face. I want a live audience with Dick Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld and Bush and i want to show them all the video footage that shows that this was a controlled demolition and they have to comment the footage live in front of the audience, in front of the victims families. That would be nice to see.
    • avatar
      as opposed to a controlled demolition
      Anyone watching a demotion job on Discovery or similar channel knows what it takes to get one building to pancake and drop flat. According to official accounts, 3 buildings dropped in this manner without any external control?
    • Drain the swampin reply toDrain the swamp(Show commentHide comment)
      STOP killary !!, Currently the SAME press that has kept JFK (a mossad hit) obfuscated for 50 years, is at it again - grassy knolling the dumb goyim that it was now the sauds !!
    • avatar
      I don't believe that the 'truth' conference will change anything.
    • avatar
      We Americans need to not only find out who truly did it, but also put them in jail cells.
    • Alan Reid
      More Fetzer crap about Nukes Blew up the towers. And Nano-thermate burning under all that debris for over 3 months is just plain stupidity. Nukes cause disturbances not easily missed Mr Fetzer, and thermate reactions produce tons of very white smoke. There has been a big load of BS dropping out of Fetzer and others about this Nuke demo lie and i doubt many buy any of it. I figure to cause a burn time of Eighty Five Plus days another fuel is going to be required. One that is not dependent on an oxidizer. One that can burn slowly and cause molten steel. One that can melt rock and can do all this with tons and tons of steel and other debris on top of it. The only fuel i see doing the job is uranium 238. Placed into the towers in 1970, As a component of the tuned mass damper system that made the towers a place workers could work and not get sick from the motion. ^600 to 800 TON of TMD in each tower, A few well placed charges to clear a path from top to bottom and a shaped charge to knock the bottom out of the mass container at the top floor over the elevator shaft and a nice efficient evidence eliminator system is ready to work. Some reports say the fire burned on the site until Dec 19 Almost 100 days that pile was burning, Thermitic reactions will not burn for that long, Look at any thermate test you can find and it will show a fast and very short burn time, Fetzer lies every time he approaches the fires in the basements of tower 1 and 2. This nuke demo crap is to discredit what and who ever follos this bogus line of dung. 100 day burn time. surface temps in excess if 1200 deg and molten steel being pulled from the pile in the months after the event is not explained by Fetzer or Jones's narrative about thermate, nano or not! Mass is the issue, plain and simple.A tiny little voice like mine is the reason for all this Nuke Demo fairy story bunk. U-238 burns long and hard in the proper conditions... like those of the basements under the two towers. I have been saying this for years and years... so they came up with this line. Think about it for yourself, Three months burn, No white smoke and molten steel "Like in a foundry" all had a part, You figure the fuel needed. Fetzer says instant nuking was the cause, Jones says Thernate.... Alan Reid says 1200 to 1600 tons of Uranium-238 granules, you do a bit of math and see who is close and who is not.
    Show new comments (0)