22:17 GMT +317 December 2018
Listen Live
    This June 4, 2013 file photo shows Aurora theater shooting suspect James Holmes in court in Centennial, Colo.

    Movie Theater Chain Wants $700,000 from Aurora Shooting Victims

    © AP Photo / The Denver Post, Andy Cross, Pool, File
    Get short URL

    Cinemark, America’s third largest movie theater chain, is seeking nearly $700,000 from the victims and families of a 2012 shooting at one of their theaters in Aurora, Colorado. A state jury ruled last month that Cinemark was not liable for the incident, and now the conglomerate is seeking $699,187.13 in legal fees from the plaintiffs.

    On June 2012, 24-year-old James Holmes opened fire in the Century Aurora 16 cineplex, killing 12 people and wounding 70. Some victims were killed trying to protect others.

    Survivors of the shooting and families of victims took the chain to court in a separate federal case on charges of negligence, claiming that the attack could have been prevented with better security. That case was dismissed. Marc Bern, the lawyer for the almost 30 plaintiffs said the weeklong trial rendered an "unjust verdict."  

    Andrews Air Force Base
    © AP Photo / Pablo Martinez Monsivais

    This maneuver appeared to some to be especially cold, given that three of the five hospitals that treated the shooting victims either forgave or discounted medical bills. Children’s hospital said, in a statement, after the shooting, "We are committed to supporting these families as they heal." 

    In civil cases, the winners typically have the option of dropping whatever costs are levied, so while it seems in bad taste to ask for money from victims, the corporation may be using the dollars as a tactic to prevent further litigation.

    Final totals have to be approved by judges before people have to pay, so there’s a possibility that people involved in the case may not have to pay at all, but the coercive nature of the countersuit may shield Cinemark from having to spend more time in court. 

    Using a different tactic, families of the victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, which also occurred in 2012, focused on the manufacturers of the gun that the shooter used when he killed 26 children before killing himself on December 14. They argued that selling and marketing the AR-15 assault rifle, a gun designed for use by the military and trained professionals, to civilians constitutes negligence on the part of the companies. 

    Timothy D. Lytton, in an article for The New Republic wrote that, given the policies of some retailers, the plaintiffs might have a case. "…some gun manufacturers have sold semiautomatic assault weapons in the form of complete parts kits in order to avoid federally mandated background checks that apply to the sale of firearms but not firearm parts. Others continue to supply retail stores that they know sell hundreds of guns traced to crimes every year," he said.


    Sheriff Investigating Shooting Posted Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theory
    Documents Show Sandy Hook Shooting a Cash Cow for NRA
    Newtown Votes to Demolish Sandy Hook Killer’s Home
    US Gun Companies Yet to Respond to Lawsuit Over Sandy Hook Shooting
    Sandy Hook School Shooting Families Sue Gun Suppliers
    trial, shooting attack, aurora, James Holmes, Colorado, Aurora, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik