By that time, Rall was already a thorn in the Los Angeles Police Department's side, thanks to his irreverent column, which frequently criticised the city's cops. Shortly after "Crosswalk Crackdown" was published, a video recording, allegedly provided by the LAPD, suddenly emerged that "proved" Rall's jaywalking story was a complete fabrication.
The video claimed Rall was never handcuffed and, contrary to his account, there was no group of onlookers that gathered to argue with the cop. The video, however, was muffled, and was accompanied by an incomplete transcript, leading some to suspect that it had been tampered with. And the LA Times reportedly didn't conduct an independent analysis of the tape.
LA Times reporter Paul Pringle told Rall, who in turn told independent investigative journalist Greg Palast, that the Times accepted the transcript as truthful because it came from the LAPD.
On July 27 Rall was fired from the Times.
But Palast, based on research he carried out independently on the LAPD recording, says the transcript provided by the police to the Times does not reflect the contents of the original video.
For instance, the crowd of bystanders the LAPD denied existed can be heard addressing the police, shouting "Why'd you handcuff him?" and "Take off his handcuffs!"
Palast writes that the LAPD had good reason to have it in for Rall. His reports and drawings frequently criticized the city's police, who were made infamous by the 1991 beating of Rodney King, among other incidents.
"Why am I supporting Rall? Because this is not about jaywalking," Palast writes. "This is about killing. Police killings. And the ability of journalists to report just the facts, ma'am, free of fear of retribution by the police or media executives."