22:02 GMT +322 September 2019
Listen Live
    Sputnik radio host Brad Freidman speaks with Tim Shorrock about the existence of a secretive “shadow NSA” operated by a private contractors.

    Radio Sputnik Host: I Was Targeted by Secret 'Shadow NSA'

    © Flickr/ Lionel Martinez
    US
    Get short URL
    378
    Subscribe

    Forget the USA Freedom Act as a major step toward transparency. Relinquish all hope that it will rein the domestic spying apparatus of the NSA. Sputnik radio host Brad Friedman says he’s been targeted by a much murkier eye in the sky, and speaks with Tim Shorrock about the existence of a secretive “shadow NSA” operated by a private contractors.

    "I was, actually, personally, me and my family, were targeted by defense contractors who were contracted by the US Chamber of Commerce," BradCast host Brad Friedman says, adding that he only found out through the hacktivist group Anonymous.

    As investigative journalist Tim Shorrock points out, Freidman is far from the only person to be affected by the so-called "shadow NSA."

    This is what Shorrock calls a "cyberintelligence ruling class," and refers to the military defense contractors who do much of the day-to-day work of the NSA. Many of the high-ranking employees in these contracting firms are former government intelligence officials.

    "In the past you had high level…officials, and people in government and in defense, moving to the private sector, but they would often go on to boards of companies not directly related to what they were doing while they were in government," Shorrock says.

    "But now what we have are high-ranking – very high-ranking – officials from intelligence, and from DOD…moving into contractors…where they are sort of replicating the same type of work they did for the government, except they are being paid millions and millions of dollars for it."

    That means that defense companies have the same access to intel as the NSA, and can use that knowledge to benefit their own corporate interests.

    "Many of them have security clearances – very high-level security clearances – where they can throw around years of experience and the classified information they get…and they can use that now for the benefit of the companies their firms will work with."

    This straddling of the government and private sectors has very little oversight.

    "They may be working for the government, they may be working for the private sector, but they’re doing essentially the same thing."

    Part of the problem also comes from the fact that many of these former intelligence officials go on to become “security experts” who mainstream media outlets rely on for information.

    Shorrock notes NBC and MSNBC in particular. While these experts are often cited as being former government intelligence officers, it’s rarely mentioned that they currently work for corporations which have a vested interest in maintaining the surveillance state.

    "By not telling the public, the public is misled," he says. "[A security expert] also has money invested in this, he’s being paid by a company that’s making their money from those agencies."

    "Someone else without that interest could have a very different interpretation of how important or how not important the Patriot Act is," he adds, referring to the Bush-era legislation used to justify domestic surveillance in the name of national security.

    Congress hasn’t helped much, either. While the legislative body is supposed to oversee cooperation between the government and defense contractors, Congressional members and the states they represent also make a profit from these private companies.

    Stilll, the most alarming part of the shadow intelligence agency is the sheer size of it, given that nearly 3 million people have security clearances in the United States.

    "You have all these people with classified information, because that’s what a security clearance is for…and most of them are working for private companies that contract for the government…so you have a huge number of people in our country who are spying on us."

    Related:

    The Long Con: How Right-Wing Media Misinforms Americans
    US Lawmakers Approve 'Pot-Friendly' Measures, Paving Way for Legalization?
    For Better or Worse: US Freedom Act Passed as Replacement to Patriot Act
    Tags:
    domestic surveillance, National Security Agency (NSA), Tim Shorrock, Brad Friedman, United States
    Community standardsDiscussion
    Comment via FacebookComment via Sputnik