02:55 GMT14 April 2021
Listen Live
    Get short URL
    0 33

    The US Government Accountability Office found that the DHS Office of Program Accountability and Risk Management, which is responsible for acquisition policy, does not have clearly defined roles and responsibilities for acquisition management.

    WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has improved oversight of some acquisition programs, but has failed to adequately monitor their ongoing costs, the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) said in a report on Monday.

    “DHS does not have a structure in place for overseeing the costs of 42 programs in sustainment — programs that have been fielded and are operational — for which acquisition documentation requirements were waived,” the report said.

    The GAO explained that sustainment costs can amount to more than 80 percent of total program costs.

    The report also found that the DHS Office of Program Accountability and Risk Management, which is responsible for acquisition policy, does not have clearly define roles and responsibilities for acquisition management.

    The office has outdated information and does not provide sufficient data on acquisitions programs, according to the GAO.

    The Accountability Office noted that the DHS has implemented some of its recommendations, but has failed to implement most.

    In early March, US President Barack Obama signed a budget to fund the DHS through the end of September. In fiscal year 2014, DHS planned to spend $10.7 billion on acquisition programs.

    The GAO is a US federal agency that monitors government bodies on behalf of the US Congress.



    US House Republicans Need to Pass DHS Funding Before Deadline - White House
    US Senators Vote to Reject DHS Funding Bill Debate for Fourth Time
    DHS Funding Depends on House Speaker Permission to Vote – White House
    US House May Take Three Weeks to Resolve DHS Funding - Senator
    acquisition, US Government Accountability Office (GAO), DHS, US
    Community standardsDiscussion